One thing about this that smelled fishy was how could the supposed red lacy bra part of it be ripped off that easily if it was a real bra. It's not easy ripping off a bra, especially when it's just the cup. If it wasn't supposed to be intentional, I'm sure Janet would have had the sense to wear a REAL bra instead of one that seemed just to be attached to the outfit.

Wardrobe malfunction my ass.

maybe j.jackson was supposed to rip up HIS shirt and reveal timberlake's bra! LOL!
_________________

niko2x wrote:

maybe j.jackson was supposed to rip up HIS shirt and reveal timberlake's bra! LOL!

LOL! Now that would've been a story!!

man i turned on the tv this morning b4 i headed out for school... (i dun watch much tv) ...and MAN THIS CRAP IS ALL OVER THE NEWS/TALKSHOWS here.... don't they have anything better to report on?

isn't there like a war in iraq or something?

lovelessemotion wrote:

man i turned on the tv this morning b4 i headed out for school... (i dun watch much tv) ...and MAN THIS CRAP IS ALL OVER THE NEWS/TALKSHOWS here.... don't they have anything better to report on? isn't there like a war in iraq or something?

Hey man you know how it is....take the last two weeks for example.

We landed two (i think?) robots on Mars, but I was too busy being bomabarded with news that Britney Spears got marriied then divorced to actually learn anything worthwhile.

O yea lovelessemotion that avatar is maddd hoootttttt! Where'd you get that from! (Look at my post on "How does your Deesktop look like?" for more subjective view on my feeling on this subject )

This might sound shallow but I'm more interested in Janet and J.Lo than light and planets and things like that. The TV stations want ratings and magazines want to sell copies so they're just writing things that interest most people. And poor Janet. If I had her boobs I'd show em off too.

this story is a hit!!!

well i dont know if its intentional or what but judging from the incident it seems like it. what kind of dance they're dancing that rip someone clothes anyway!

yes i am alive! (if any of you wondered where i went, which is probably no one )

this whole thing is a big deal because the super bowl is a HUGE thing. millions of people worldwide watch it. it's also a family program. with that in mind there are a lot of parents that are mad because their children witnessed somethign that was totally unaproriate to them (although i kinda liked it )

i think that it was on an accident. i think that justin was only suppose to grab the black part of janet's outfit. and as you can see the 2 layers a pretty close to each other making it easier for justin to grab the wrong part. and about the issue with janet's bra, who knows it could have been some unique $300 bra that celebraties buy. that could be the reason it came off the way it did. if you've ever been in victoria's secret, they have a lot of weird panties and bras.

at first i thought it was staged because i thought that janet had a sticker covering her nipple such as little kim did in the 1999 mtv something awards.

http://www.fresh-hell.com/media/mtv99b.htm

but looking at a close up picture i find out that it wasnt a sticker and that it was a jewl in which you can accually see the nipple poking out of the middle! and i do think that that's janet's style to wear something like that. if it was staged then why did she have that look on her face. and why did she cover it with her hand?

anyways just my opinions...

Well Justin Timberlake said it was "an accident" but Janet Jackson has said that it was a last minute change to the program and it was just a publicity stunt. Who do I believe? Justin or Janet? No brainer! Come on! The cup part of bra doesn't tear off that easy and what a coincidence that it happened when Justin was singing the line "i'll have you naked by the end of this song." Obviously it was planned ahead of time and no one will convince me otherwise.

But the question on hand, as mentioned by others before me on this forum, WHO THE HECK CARES?! Let it rest people. Report some actual news. It's sad, but I bet years from now, no one will remember that this was one heck of a Superbowl game, but people will remember that Janet's boob created all this controversy.

Slackey wrote:

But the question on hand, as mentioned by others before me on this forum, WHO THE HECK CARES?! Let it rest people. Report some actual news. It's sad, but I bet years from now, no one will remember that this was one heck of a Superbowl game, but people will remember that Janet's boob created all this controversy.

You are on the mark. The game died away really fast, but this story is lingering like that dead whale that exploded in Taiwan... Everyone is pointing the finger at someone else... What a fiasco... You see sleazeball crap on TV everyday with those reality shows, but the FCC and these other supposedly righteous groups are singling out the Super Bowl... What a joke.

marecore wrote:

We landed two (i think?) robots on Mars, but I was too busy being bomabarded with news that Britney Spears got marriied then divorced to actually learn anything worthwhile.

i know i could care less about this thing... i would rather hear about how we can put a man on mars or whatever!

pangit wrote:

yes i am alive! (if any of you wondered where i went, which is probably no one )

i care! where were ya?

Precious Bamboo wrote:

This might sound shallow but I'm more interested in Janet and J.Lo than light and planets and things like that.

yes that does sound shallow... jk... ur just part of the general public that's all.its all good..

Precious Bamboo wrote:

And poor Janet. If I had her boobs I'd show em off too.

hey why not? show the off! (oh god not only am i going to hell... i'm also going to jail...)

lovelessemotion wrote:

i know i could care less about this thing... i would rather hear about how we can put a man on mars or whatever!

I mean...I wouldn't mind hearing about that shallow stuff...but I can't take it when it's dragged on forrrr sooooooooo looonnnnggggggg...i bet u people will still be talking about this boob thing for awhile

BTW who is that girl on ur avatar!

marecore wrote:

O yea lovelessemotion that avatar is maddd hoootttttt! Where'd you get that from! (Look at my post on "How does your Deesktop look like?" for more subjective view on my feeling on this subject )

marecore wrote:

BTW who is that girl on ur avatar!

u guys make me laugh out loud! i love this website ur all so funny!
to answer ur Q that's my wife jkjkjk
she's the VEERRRRRRRRRRy famous MEGUMI.... i think niko has a thread on her .....one sec ...here http://jdorama.com/viewtopic_2832.htm

lovelessemotion wrote:

u guys make me laugh out loud! i love this website ur all so funny!

HAHA you know what's I've been doing for the past 5 minutes?

Looking at all of ur past posts and seeing that avatar everywhere....forget Janet Jackson I say!

*q answered* .....and yup "janet?...janet who!?"

marecore wrote:

BTW who is that girl on ur avatar!

Megumi a.k.a. Japan's "Got Milk?" Girl.

Yummy [of course, you love milk too right!]

kndy

kndy-nt2099 wrote:

Yummy [of course, you love milk too right!]

...actualy i like YUUKA alot more...

kndy-nt2099 wrote:

Megumi a.k.a. Japan's "Got Milk?" Girl. Yummy [of course, you love milk too right!] kndy

whoa she was in a commerical for this?

i tought u said u were going to sleep?..... GO TO SLEEP U!... and have sweet megumi dreams...

You know...we seen these gravure Japanese models...are there such models in Korea or Hong Kong?

kndy