some people actually think that peoples freedom and innocence is a joke ,
whether or not your opinion of mj is posotive er negative, there is no reason why you and people like you! should turn this case into a joke.
it isnt funny! if u think he is a molester, ....not funny
and if you think that he is an innocnet kind guy, who is being framed and taken advantage of....that is nothin to laugh about either
anyway it doesnt matter what you think bcs MJ is free!

whatever!
today is a good day for me! i dont feel like arguing with anyone!

Did anyone catch that lady on TV? The one releasing those doves, one for each acquittal. Sheesh, what a freak!

Honestly, I wasn't that surprised with the verdict. It's next to impossible to convict a celebrity, especially someone like Jackson. Whether the jurors want to admit it or not, his celebrity had to have affected their judgement.

Oh well, maybe next time?


Here's a question for those of you who are so sure of his innocence:

Would you ever let a young loved one (son, brother, whatever) spend a night with Michael Jackson?

blender1184 wrote:

Did anyone catch that lady on TV? The one releasing those doves, one for each acquittal. Sheesh, what a freak! Honestly, I wasn't that surprised with the verdict. It's next to impossible to convict a celebrity, especially someone like Jackson. Whether the jurors want to admit it or not, his celebrity had to have affected their judgement. Oh well, maybe next time? Here's a question for those of you who are so sure of his innocence: Would you ever let a young loved one (son, brother, whatever) spend a night with Michael Jackson?

yeah the one with the whole box full .... poor thing could not even show him those .. as he just went to his car!

sexabuse i donno ... but even all tv stations were wondering that he got a clean slate ... even for alcohol n all ... but welll thats that ... he is free and well that stays

blender1184 wrote:

Did anyone catch that lady on TV? The one releasing those doves, one for each acquittal. Sheesh, what a freak! Honestly, I wasn't that surprised with the verdict. It's next to impossible to convict a celebrity, especially someone like Jackson. Whether the jurors want to admit it or not, his celebrity had to have affected their judgement. Oh well, maybe next time? Here's a question for those of you who are so sure of his innocence: Would you ever let a young loved one (son, brother, whatever) spend a night with Michael Jackson?

since MJ is free, and all this crap is dead
ima leave it that way, i wont answer dumb ass questions that ive been asked 100 times, all over again
I could care less about what anyone thinks of em, thas ma boy unless i see undeniable proof! im always on his side

First I thought "who the F is MJ"... then i realized who it is. Oyvech.

I wouldn't let anyone near him, especially not my kids (then again, I wouldn't let anyone who I don't know close to them). He'd get within 5 yards of my kids and I'd blast him royally with an USAS 12. I always found him... odd. I mean, he's afro-american, yet had his skin paled? Errrrr... so much for sticking to what he is, such people always appear to me as... odd.

He's basically not guilty because they couldn't really prove that he's guilty, which is, well... quite worthless. In dubiu pro reo, nothing more. Basically a Phyruss victory for him. He's still ruined financially and his times as "king of pop" are over.

It could still go into the next higher court, or there could be a new round with new players in a few year (I wouldn't be surprised if that would actually happen)... Who knows, who cares. This guy's done for and has been for a while.

blender1184 wrote:

Here's a question for those of you who are so sure of his innocence: Would you ever let a young loved one (son, brother, whatever) spend a night with Michael Jackson?

I wouldnt let my son, brother, young anyone sleep with a freak: period. Even an innocent one. End of story.
_________________

Trade or Distro
It's all good!

Check out my drama trade list: http://www.freewebs.com/evendrama/

Did anyone else here that her husband blead her dry? Isn't that kind of weird . Please excuse my "out-of-the-loop"ness. What can I say? I work full time and then some . Anyway, does anyone know if this is true or not? Don't wanna start a gossip topic or anything , I just want to make sure that the peeps on the radio weren't playing jokes.
_________________

i wouldn't suprise me if that did happen. new house ($7mill, was it?), not working, medical bills, idiot of a husband

Good for her, she deserves it...
_________________

That'd really suck if it were true .
_________________

krim wrote:

idiot of a husband

And she isn't?

bmwracer wrote:

And she isn't?

i never implied she wasn't.

bmwracer wrote:

And she isn't?

Compared to Kevin, Britney looks like Einstein.



...And that isn't saying much.

Wow eh , you guys are brutally honest aren't you ?

LOL
_________________

LMAO! I wouldn't be surprised if she was broke! She's a big spender. But that Kevin, no doubt he's a gold-digger. I heard recently that he's even been visiting his ex a bit too often. Must be cheating on Britney. I would really love to see them on Jerry Springers.

Ya know I always wonder what type of woman would steal another woman's man especially when she knew the other woman was pregnant at the time! Brittney may want to remember this expression.."What comes around goes around."

True ne. But I think at the time when Britney and Kevin started dating, Kevin was planning on dumping his girlfriend who was pregnant with his child. I say the guy is as much to be blamed as the woman.

oh dear! guess nobody here likes britney then!

when she first burst on the scene at sweet 17 with 'hit me baby one more time' she was all the rage here in the uk. but i guess with over exposure in the media people got overloaded with her and lost interest. the same happened with the spice girls. remember them?

it would appear to be the 'cash in quick' routine. is she a victim or orchestrator of what's happened? i don't know her well enough to decide but would be interested in others' opinions.

Haha, yeah, but Britney has been popular worldwide for a good number of years, she was quite popular up until she released her self-titled album. The "sexy" route doesn't quite work since there are so many female stars in America who are just as sexy if not more. Yeah, I remember Spice Girls, but they were only popular for about a year here.

Anyways, as for who's to be blamed for Britney going bankrupt, I say it's really her fault. She's been a big spender since she became famous. The money goes out more than the money goes in, so the news of going bankrupt is eventual. And well, Kevin is a big spender as well. He doesn't make as much money and he buys the ugliest gangster clothes. His fashion is a big NO-NO! And as a mother, Britney should start dressing more like one... shouldn't be walking around the street in skanky transparent clothes and daisy shorts.

pumpkin puff wrote:

True ne. But I think at the time when Britney and Kevin started dating, Kevin was planning on dumping his girlfriend who was pregnant with his child. I say the guy is as much to be blamed as the woman.

Ooh I agree. You know what they say..."When you lie down with dogs, you wake up with fleas!"