wow you guyz are really funny... but i agree to K.T.Tran... explore more... dont be too stick with Erika... (not that i want you guyz to dump Erika)...
Yeah, explore more like... Sorimachi thread
ruji wrote:
So my daily dosage is 60% Erika Sawajiri, 35% Mao Inoue, and so far, only 5% for Aya Ueto...
maybe you shouldn't have your eyes on girls all times... Sorimachi Takashi is nice too _________________
kami is "god", kaze for "wind"
Last edited by kami_kaze on Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
maybe you shouldn't have your eyes on girls all times... Sorimachi Takashi is nice too
quoting myself
Watch HOTMAN since Erika got appear in it... well, a bit
there's also Konishi Manami & Ichikawa Yui if you dun like Sorimachi _________________
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 449 Location: 13��00' North of the Equator, 122��00' East of Greenwich Country:
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:02 pm Post subject:
K.T.Tran wrote:
hahaha, sticking to a girl that is all three....actress, gravure idol, and a singer No wonder you just stick around here a lot.
@Ruji: HAHAHHA Aya ruling with an Iron fist??? *Imagines*
Some unlucky j-idol----> <----Aya
The unlikiness of it all
Well if you were able to come up with something like that. You'd be good in the political world
LOL, I didn't even know it said that. It was just a result of a random complaint generator.. You could try that with "Erika Sawajiri" and post the results here. Try it on the link I gave above. You could also have it display 10 paragraphs of complaint.
Post your complaint about Erika and we'll be in page 1000 in a jiffy...
Joined: 17 Sep 2004 Posts: 14056 Location: San Ho Se, Ka-Ri-Por-Nya Country:
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:10 pm Post subject:
ruji wrote:
LOL, I didn't even know it said that. It was just a result of a random complaint generator.. You could try that with "Erika Sawajiri" and post the results here. Try it on the link I gave above. You could also have it display 10 paragraphs of complaint.
Post your complaint about Erika and we'll be in page 1000 in a jiffy...
Here it is. I haven't read all of it yet, but it's pretty funny from what i've read so far.
If you are stimulated by new ideas and if you can think for yourself rather than simply accept what Miss Erika Sawajiri dishes out, I think you will find this letter of interest. First and foremost, if we don't soon tell Erika to stop what she's doing, she will proceed with her malign crusades, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Erika our permission to do so. She should judge not, lest she be judged. Why is that relevant to this letter? Because she says she's going to usher in the beginning of a blockish new era of gangsterism before long. Is she out of her brown-nosing mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that her Ponzi schemes reek of Dadaism. I use the word "reek" because we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Erika's quixotic cajoleries, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature.) Erika motivates people to join her retinue by using words like "humanity", "compassion", and "unity". This is a great deception. What Erika really wants to do is ruin my entire day. That's why Erika and I disagree about our civic duties. I think that we must do our utmost to shed the light of truth on the evil that is Erika as expeditiously as possible. Erika, on the other hand, believes that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders".
It troubles and amazes me to think that you should not ask, "Do sex-crazed bigamists like Erika's trucklers actually have lives, or do they exist solely to divert attention from Erika's unprovoked aggression?", but rather, "Is Erika so empty-headed as to think that this can go on forever?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because to Erika's mind, she has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. So that means that profits come before people, right? No, not right. The truth is that I've heard Erika say that she is a refined lady with the soundest education and morals you can imagine. Was that just a slip of the lip or is Erika secretly trying to mold your mind and have you see the world not as it is, but as she wants you to see it? It is only when one has an answer to that question is it possible to make sense of her off-the-cuff comments because in a recent essay, she stated that she is entitled to require religious services around the world to begin with "Erika is great; Erika is good; we thank Erika for our daily food". Since the arguments Erika made in the rest of her essay are based in part on that assumption, Erika should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because if I didn't think Erika would cultivate an unhealthy sense of victimhood, I wouldn't say that her favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". Erika likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. She then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for her to replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on deceitful emotionalism. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that it takes more than a mass of ignominious social outcasts to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of boosterism. Why am I furious? Because her ultimata may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into hypocritical Marxism. And why am I embarrassed? Because I am not fooled by Erika's brazen and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that corporatism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's Erika's favorite; it makes it easy for her to use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of deranged, fatuitous libertines. I won't mince my words: Erika has stated that children should get into cars with strangers who wave lots of yummy candy at them. That's just pure negativism. Well, in Erika's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that when Erika says that she has the trappings of deity, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. Contrary to the Rousseauian ideal of the transparency of the general will to itself, she may unwittingly undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. I say "unwittingly" because she is apparently unaware that she operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why mere association tends to lend credence to Erika's cohorts because people assume they can't be that bad if a respected person is associated with them. If you doubt this, just ask around. The central paradox of Erika's personal attacks, the twist that makes Erika's refrains so irresistible to vulgar moral weaklings, is that these people truly believe that we can stop factionalism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for pretentious ruffians. We must do away with the misconception that society is supposed to be lenient towards socially inept duffers. You might claim I'm telling you this because I like to beat up on Erika. Really, that isn't my principal reason. I don't especially need to beat up on her, because she is already despised by decent and knowledgeable people almost everywhere.
Whenever someone tells Erika not to cheat on taxes, Erika gets all teary-eyed. My, my; how sad. My heart bleeds for her, it really does. According to the laws of probability, she keeps telling us that she is a model citizen. Are we also supposed to believe that the purpose of life is self-gratification? I didn't think so. Everywhere she's gone, she has tried to publish blatantly loquacious rhetoric as "education" for children to learn in school. It can happen here, too. The first lies that Erika told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; her lies will grow until they blot out the sun.
Erika supports a wide variety of adages. Some are hate-filled; others are infantile. A few openly support imperialism. There are two classes of people in this world. There are those who support hostile governments known for human rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery, and there are those who put an end to her evildoing. Erika fits neatly into the former category, of course. She sees all the evidence, but she is reluctant to accept the conclusion that I appreciate feedback and other people's views on subjects. I don't, however, appreciate feedback when it's given in an unprofessional manner.
In general, Erika throws a tantrum every time she doesn't get what she wants. Sure, there are exceptions, but the space remaining in this letter will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which she has tried to create a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason -- a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture. If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to call your attention to the problem of illaudable galoots. One last thing: It is my greatest and most solemn pleasure to expose injustice and puncture prejudice.
This will probably spand the pgs a good 5-10 pages depending on how you fans as well as critics such as myself comment on it. _________________
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 295 Location: Canada Country:
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:19 pm Post subject:
K.T.Tran wrote:
Here it is. I haven't read all of it yet, but it's pretty funny from what i've read so far.
[i]If you are stimulated by new ideas and if you can think for yourself rather than simply accept what Miss Erika Sawajiri dishes out, I think you will find this letter of interest.
Haven't read it all yet, but want to respond after reading the first sentence.
I'll gladly accept whatever Miss Erika Sawajiri dishes out _________________
Joined: 17 Sep 2004 Posts: 14056 Location: San Ho Se, Ka-Ri-Por-Nya Country:
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:21 pm Post subject:
mufc wrote:
Haven't read it all yet, but want to respond after reading the first sentence.
I'll gladly accept whatever Miss Erika Sawajiri dishes out
thinking of some kind of tasty dish aren't you??
All in all the letter was ridiculously funny. I don't remember about it, but you guys can sure prove that the Erika isn't the person that complaint letter portrays her to be. _________________
Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 449 Location: 13��00' North of the Equator, 122��00' East of Greenwich Country:
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:27 pm Post subject:
At least we could joke around until any new updates and news about Erika comes out. This thread has been pretty slow lately, in terms of news and updates.
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 295 Location: Canada Country:
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:33 pm Post subject:
K.T.Tran wrote:
Here it is. I haven't read all of it yet, but it's pretty funny from what i've read so far.
Sure, there are exceptions, but the space remaining in this letter will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which she has tried to create a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason -- a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture.
I'm not so sure about the rest, but the world will definitely have beauty, enough to pleasure my eyes for a lifetime _________________
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum