“ú–{Œê‚Ì—ûK

‚Ý‚È‚³‚ñBBB‚±‚ñ‚΂ñ‚Í...‚à‚¤8ŒŽ‚Å‚·B‘åŠw‚̉ċx‚Ý‚àŽn‚Ü‚Á‚½‚Æ‚±‚ë‚Å‚·B :finger_bleah: ‰´‚àŽŽŒ±‚ªI‚í‚Á‚Ä‹x‚Ý‚ÆŽv‚Á‚½‚Ì‚É...æ¶‚ÍŽÀŒ±‚ð‚â‚炵‚½‚ñ‚Å‚·B :shocked: Žc”O‚Å‚·II‹x‚Ý–³‚µII :beatyou: :bonk: :bleh: :crazy: :banghead: ‚¯‚ñ‚ׂñ‚µ‚Ä‚­‚êII :crazy: :bow: :bow: :bow:

grayfox5129 wrote:‚Ý‚È‚³‚ñBBB‚±‚ñ‚΂ñ‚Í...‚à‚¤8ŒŽ‚Å‚·B‘åŠw‚̉ċx‚Ý‚àŽn‚Ü‚Á‚½‚Æ‚±‚ë‚Å‚·B :finger_bleah: ‰´‚àŽŽŒ±‚ªI‚í‚Á‚Ä‹x‚Ý‚ÆŽv‚Á‚½‚Ì‚É...æ¶‚ÍŽÀŒ±‚ð‚â‚炵‚½‚ñ‚Å‚·B :shocked: Žc”O‚Å‚·II‹x‚Ý–³‚µII :beatyou: :bonk: :bleh: :crazy: :banghead: ‚¯‚ñ‚ׂñ‚µ‚Ä‚­‚êII :crazy: :bow: :bow: :bow:

‚â‚Á‚Ï‚è ‘å•Ï‚Å‚·‚ˁI ‚ª‚ñ‚΂Á‚āI ‚ ‚«‚ç‚ß‚È‚¢‚ŁI

‚‰‚b‚‚”‚³‚ñ ‚±‚¿‚炱‚» ‚æ‚낵‚­‚ˁI

Quick question....

In textbooks, it's commonly taught that if you want to show that you like something u use ‚ªD‚«

‚½‚Æ‚¦‚΁A‚k‚t‚m‚`@‚r‚d‚`‚ª‘åD‚«B But is it correct to say ‚k‚t‚m‚`@‚r‚d‚`@h‚Ɂh@‘åD‚«H

Thanks

Airbum88 wrote:Quick question....

‚½‚Æ‚¦‚΁A‚k‚t‚m‚`@‚r‚d‚`‚ª‘åD‚«B But is it correct to say ‚k‚t‚m‚`@‚r‚d‚`@h‚Ɂh@‘åD‚«H

Thanks

No.

You can say uLUNA SEA‚ðD‚«‚É‚È‚Á‚½Bv
The only real context that you would see u‚É‘åD‚«v is in something like
u–l‚Í‚ ‚̐l‚É‘åD‚«‚ÆŒ¾‚Á‚½Bv

š‘‰¤

¡“ú‚́II
‚ ‚È‚½ ‚Í A ƒJƒi ‚µ‚Ü‚·‚©B J rock ƒCƒhƒ‹ ‚Å‚·B

‚ ‚½‚µ ‚Í ƒoƒJ‚Å‚·‚ˁB ‚ ‚½‚µ ‚Í ƒJƒi ‚ª ‘åD‚« ‚Å‚·‚ˁB :twisted:

‚Ö‚¦A‚²‚ß‚ñ‚Ë

‚±‚± ‚É ƒy[ƒO ‚Ì ZŠ : http://snotcat.com/kana/

nice* :twisted:

Miyu_Kaya wrote:

[image]

[image]

‰½‚»‚êH :sweat:

‚±‚ê ‚Í ƒJƒi‚Å‚·BJROCK ƒCƒhƒ‹‚Å‚·‚æB ‚µ‚Ü‚·‚©B
:twisted: ƒJƒbƒRƒCƒCII

Miyu_Kaya wrote:‚±‚ê ‚Í ƒJƒi‚Å‚·BJROCK ƒCƒhƒ‹‚Å‚·‚æB ‚µ‚Ü‚·‚©B
:twisted: ƒJƒbƒRƒCƒCII

But I see no pics :sweat: All I see is: "If you keep stealing my bandwidth and/or pictures, I will hurt you, asshole" :beaten: Sorry to put that in English in this thread :sweat:

KouSeiya315 wrote:

But I see no pics :sweat: All I see is: "If you keep stealing my bandwidth and/or pictures, I will hurt you, asshole" :beaten: Sorry to put that in English in this thread :sweat:

It's all good hon. :D

I see the same thing too and I can't make out the Japanese dialogue being typed out. (Doesn't really make sense) Nor do I understand the situation. So I have no idea what's going on. :beaten:

I'm just gonna leave it alone. :beaten:

ahochaude wrote:I see the same thing too and I can't make out the Japanese dialogue being typed out.

I see the pics (I use an anti anti-leech filter).

Apparently Kana is an idol that likes to dress up in gothgirl/babygirl outfits or something. Not sure that's on topic though.

ƒAƒCƒhƒ‹ not@ƒCƒhƒ‹ is what the poster of the pictures meant, I think...stealing pics' bandwidth is bad, man. HAHAHA.

So she stole someone else's pics and posted it in this thread? :crazy: :confused:

ahochaude wrote:So she stole someone else's pics and posted it in this thread? :crazy: :confused:

No ... I don't think they are "stolen" per se... it's just that apparently they were linked directly, and the server that they were linked from doesn't allow that. Happens all the time, usually without the intent to "steal", but to the owner, that's the effect anyway.

The way a server can tell if the pics are linked from another site is from the HTTP Referer header. Sometimes site owners prevent others from directly linking to pics, and that's called an anti-leech feature. I use a filter that forges the Referer header so I'm not bothered by anti-leech features.
I strongly believe that use of the Referer header for any feature like that is ill-advised, but it's pretty much your only option if you want to try to prevent direct linking. But I'm sure no one cares about that but me :)

‹‚¢‚Å‚·‚ˁI :beatyou:

vibius wrote:

No ... I don't think they are "stolen" per se... it's just that apparently they were linked directly, and the server that they were linked from doesn't allow that. Happens all the time, usually without the intent to "steal", but to the owner, that's the effect anyway.

The way a server can tell if the pics are linked from another site is from the HTTP Referer header. Sometimes site owners prevent others from directly linking to pics, and that's called an anti-leech feature. I use a filter that forges the Referer header so I'm not bothered by anti-leech features.
I strongly believe that use of the Referer header for any feature like that is ill-advised, but it's pretty much your only option if you want to try to prevent direct linking. But I'm sure no one cares about that but me :)

Oh, I see. Damn vibius, you're really proficient in computers, huh?! :D
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
How do you get an anti leech filter by the way?

ahochaude wrote:How do you get an anti leech filter by the way?

I wrote my own. It works like a web proxy, but it can arbitrarily change anything as it passes between my browser and the web.

vibius wrote:I wrote my own. It works like a web proxy, but it can arbitrarily change anything as it passes between my browser and the web.

Damn. Well, unfortunately that's too "high-tech" for me. :beaten:

‰½‚̘bH‚킯‚í‚©‚ñ‚ˁBBB“ú–{Œê‚ÅŒ¾‚¢‚¿‚Ⴆ‚΂ǂ¤H

“ú–{Œê‚Ì—ûK‚Å‚µ‚傤H :beatyou: :hehe:

•ª‚©‚Á‚½‚©‚çB@‚à‚¤‚¦‚¦‚æB@@‚Ù‚Æ‚¯B