Got Something You Want To Say?

Started by ahochaude · 23 Nov 2003 · 35,048 replies

General Discussion Page 1537 of 1753

7 Dec 2009, 06:14 #30721
Anime Dad wrote:I disagree. If a sporting figure had made a racist remark, would that make it something for the sport thread? You can make it sound any way you like. Sure, certain people may not like Palin's politics, but they are not attacking her politics, they are commenting on her alleged racist remarks.

But they're not her racist remarks, alleged or proven. They're remarks taken in implication from her father(he doesn't say she hated them, but implied that was a reason she left), as recounted by writers(did they interview him or was it something they heard?), and interpreted by a reviewer. That's three layers of interpretation that do NOT lead back directly to her. The screams of racism come ONLY from members here who are politically opposite of her and hate her because of it.
7 Dec 2009, 06:14 #30722
Kijinnmaru wrote:
Um no. Palin is a political figure and your attacks on her are grounded purely in your own political ideology.


Where did I "attack" her in that previous post?
7 Dec 2009, 06:24 #30723
gaijinmark wrote:

Where did I "attack" her in that previous post?

Implication that she's racist. The same way she's being attacked.
7 Dec 2009, 06:26 · edited #30724
Kijinnmaru wrote:
Implication that she's racist. The same way she's being attacked.


I never said or implied anything. I just quoted the article. The only place anything is being implied is somewhere in your head, which from the posts I've read of yours on this forum, is probably a pretty scary place.
7 Dec 2009, 06:28 #30725
Kijinnmaru wrote: The screams of racism come ONLY from members here who are politically opposite of her and hate her because of it.


Once again, that's your opinion. You don't know that for sure. They are not "attacking" her "politics", just commenting on the racist allegations. You're the one who's making it political.
7 Dec 2009, 06:36 #30726
gaijinmark wrote:

I never said or implied anything. I just quoted the article.

You quoted the article in support of the racist argument alone. Whether intentional or not, you implied she was racist. Same way she's being implicated. The whole motivation of the racist argument is political difference, or it would have been noticed that layers of indirect implication was all it was. The attacks and politics go hand-in-hand here.
7 Dec 2009, 06:39 #30727
OK, subject is closed, or this thread will be locked.
7 Dec 2009, 06:43 #30728
Anime Dad wrote:

Once again, that's your opinion. You don't know that for sure. They are not "attacking" her "politics", just commenting on the racist allegations. You're the one who's making it political.

Fair enough. Would they be commenting on alleged racist remarks implied upon here if she was not a political opposite? Or would it have been a non-issue?
7 Dec 2009, 06:49 #30729
^ A racist is a racist, period.
7 Dec 2009, 06:51 #30730
Before this thread gets locked, I see the Tiger Woods Tag Heuer billboard is still up on the corner of Torrance and Western. Anybody want to bet it won't be up next weekend?
7 Dec 2009, 06:52 #30731
gaijinmark wrote:Before this thread gets locked, I see the Tiger Woods Tag Heuer billboard is still up on the corner of Torrance and Western. Anybody want to bet it won't be up next weekend?


:lol:
7 Dec 2009, 06:54 #30732
Kijinnmaru wrote:
Fair enough. Would they be commenting on alleged racist remarks implied upon here if she was not a political opposite? Or would it have been a non-issue?


If I hadn't already said the subject was closed, I would respond. But I have.

Subject Closed.
7 Dec 2009, 07:00 #30733
Anime Dad wrote:

If I hadn't already said the subject was closed, I would respond. But I have.

Subject Closed.

Just to clarify, that post was written at the same time you were closing the subject. I didn't see your post until after I posted; it wasn't a stab at you.
7 Dec 2009, 07:24 #30734
No problem :)
7 Dec 2009, 10:26 #30735
Wynter wrote:Can someone help me solved this problem:

X X X





o o o



Each circle needs to connect to each X with a line. However, the lines can't cross each other. Is it possible?


Erm... so no one knows? Thanks xploring, for trying to help me. :)
7 Dec 2009, 10:38 #30736
Wynter wrote:

Erm... so no one knows? Thanks xploring, for trying to help me. :)


[image]

Oh, that didn't work. I thought that was it. Maybe it could be done if it's 3-dimensional.
7 Dec 2009, 10:48 #30737
Wynter wrote:Can someone help me solved this problem:

X X X





o o o



Each circle needs to connect to each X with a line. However, the lines can't cross each other. Is it possible?


It is very possible! :mrgreen: Hint: Think outside the box.
7 Dec 2009, 10:49 #30738
xploring wrote:

[image]

Oh, that didn't work. I thought that was it. Maybe it could be done if it's 3-dimensional.


Yea, that's what I was thinking, as well. I'll make a model of it tomorrow morning and photograph the results. :victory:

Otherwise, I'm prepared to give this answer: It's impossible. It has to be. I've tried it every way my mind could allow.
7 Dec 2009, 11:25 #30739
If you read here they have come to the same conclusion - it's not possible.

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.