Got Something You Want To Say?

Started by ahochaude · 23 Nov 2003 · 35,048 replies

General Discussion Page 169 of 1753

3 Jul 2004, 23:08 #3361
what is the name of that movie with takashi tsukamoto , where is on a baseball team er, somethin...cats eye....somethin i dunno..what is the name and is it worth watchin????????
- oh yeah and i asked a sexy stranger if i could take his pic for a web site and he said not today i look too messed up....(he looked pretty sexy to me) but i think he thinx im psyco.....so he'll probobly never let me take it.
dah well. look cuz of yall i got in trouble!!!!hahahaha
-i will always stalk sexy men....ALWAYS!
cuz its fun :beaten:
3 Jul 2004, 23:14 #3362
Michi wrote:cool
issit urs????
:beaten:

btw
is touch response = key sensitivity/velocity?


hehe..my babygrand is not Yamaha, it's very old german brand called Hoffmann, bought it long, long time ago...second hand. :)
I wish that Yamaha baby grand were mine..it's not it belongs to some cafe..hehehehe :beaten: I got bored so I played it around.

touch response= key sensitivity? you mean in the keyboard? or Piano?
3 Jul 2004, 23:14 #3363
lol
:beaten:
3 Jul 2004, 23:15 #3364
Akakage wrote:

hehe..my babygrand is not Yamaha, it's very old german brand called Hoffmann, bought it long, long time ago...second hand. :)
I wish that Yamaha baby grand were mine..it's not it belongs to some cafe..hehehehe :beaten: I got bored so I played it around.

touch response= key sensitivity? you mean in the keyboard? or Piano?


wow
u have a baby grand
so cool!!!
:nut:
both piano n keyboard
is there any diff?
3 Jul 2004, 23:32 #3365
Hehehe..dunno know exactly girl..but I guess it relates to the lighter touch of a keyboard.

go here?

http://www.musiciansnews.com/piano/69/new_technics_digital_piano.shtml
3 Jul 2004, 23:53 #3366
oohh
k thanks

actually i want the keyboard to have key velocity/sensitivity..
so that it feels like a real piano

but in the spec, they didnt mention any key velocity or sensitivity but they did state abt touch response

so just wondering if it is the same thing..

thanks for the link tho :mrgreen:
4 Jul 2004, 03:27 #3367
Michi, I actually saw your avatar, Charlize Theron in the street a couple of weeks ago...

she was on her cellphone around Times Square screaming at someone...

she seems a LOT taller than 5'10.

just figured I'd mention it.
4 Jul 2004, 05:42 #3368
Ushiroyubi wrote:Michi, I actually saw your avatar, Charlize Theron in the street a couple of weeks ago...

she was on her cellphone around Times Square screaming at someone...

she seems a LOT taller than 5'10.

just figured I'd mention it.


That's so cool. She must be so hot in real life! :love_eyes: :love_eyes:
4 Jul 2004, 05:48 #3369
bmwracer wrote:Heading off to see Spider-Man 2... Be back later!

Jaa. :)


I thought it was pretty good, but the hype got the better of the movie.
4 Jul 2004, 05:56 #3370
The first one was so duff IMO. I guess that's why I'm not so much into wanting to see the second one.
I can wait until the DVD comes out.
4 Jul 2004, 06:46 #3371
Spidey2 is good and enjoyable even though the acting was bad IMO.
4 Jul 2004, 11:09 #3372
Jsut got back from Spidey 2 and I thought it was excellent: Well-paced, the action was much better than the first one, and a pretty solid story. I'd give it a 10 out of 10 easily. Highly recommended. :applaud: :D

Of the previews I saw, the only that clearly stood out was The Bourne Supremacy. I, Robot looked sorta interesting, but the others that I could remember (Catwoman, Christmas with the Kranks), they looked bad or stupid. Really stupid.
4 Jul 2004, 13:00 #3373
bmwracer wrote:Jsut got back from Spidey 2 and I thought it was excellent: Well-paced, the action was much better than the first one, and a pretty solid story. I'd give it a 10 out of 10 easily. Highly recommended. :applaud: :D

Of the previews I saw, the only that clearly stood out was The Bourne Supremacy. I, Robot looked sorta interesting, but the others that I could remember (Catwoman, Christmas with the Kranks), they looked bad or stupid. Really stupid.


I saw it too!! Yea it was pretty good. I didn't see the first one so I can't really compare but I thought part 2 was very good. I still can't get over the fact that he actually produces webbing instead of using the cartridges in the comics but oh well, lol. I'd like to see multiple villains in part 3 though.

Damn it seems like it's been so long since I've actually posted in this topic :hehe:
4 Jul 2004, 13:14 #3374
I think in part 3 there will be Venom and the golbin..that would be awesome to watch..also part2 fight scene was better than the first.
4 Jul 2004, 13:16 #3375
eltinator wrote:I still can't get over the fact that he actually produces webbing instead of using the cartridges in the comics

Me too, Elt! It must be the engineer in us... The thinking was that for Peter Parker to devise such a thing as web-shooters was unbelievable... What a crock!! It's a movie!! A super-hero movie, to boot!! What is supposed to be believable??? Spider powers, yes, web-shooters, no?? Ridiculous. Totally ridiculous.

Okay, I'm done venting.
4 Jul 2004, 13:20 #3376
lol..I know he had a device that made a web..but I also thought he had the webby-making power in the beginning but lost it..so he had to make the device to produce webs.
4 Jul 2004, 13:24 #3377
IkematsuSosuke wrote:lol..I know he had a device that made a web..but I also thought he had the webby-making power in the beginning but lost it..so he had to make the device to produce webs.

He never made a web-shooter in the movie: the webs were generated by his body... He only created the webshooter in the comic book version.
4 Jul 2004, 13:26 #3378
bmwracer wrote:
Me too, Elt! It must be the engineer in us... The thinking was that for Peter Parker to devise such a thing as web-shooters was unbelievable... What a crock!! It's a movie!! A super-hero movie, to boot!! What is supposed to be believable??? Spider powers, yes, web-shooters, no?? Ridiculous. Totally ridiculous.

Okay, I'm done venting.


Yup that's one of the best inventions in spiderman! I always wanted one of those too, lol :hehe: :hehe:

@ike: If venom was in part 3 that would be awesome! Then maybe carnage in part 4 :D I think it's time for me to bust out those good ole spiderman comic cards again
4 Jul 2004, 13:28 #3379
I meant the cartoon..can't say comic cuz I never read them..but I thought he had the ability to make webs..than lost it so he made the device.
4 Jul 2004, 13:30 #3380
eltinator wrote:

@ike: If venom was in part 3 that would be awesome! Then maybe carnage in part 4 :D I think it's time for me to bust out those good ole spiderman comic cards again


Yeah that would be cool..I think Venom will be in part 3 cuz Jameson, Mary's fiance was venom for awhile.

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.