What things bother you the most?

Started by andorea · 20 Jan 2004 · 12,823 replies

General Discussion Page 299 of 642

27 Jun 2007, 10:01 #5961
bmwracer wrote:
"Moments" are different than "Lifestyles." :beaten:


LOL! You actually made me laugh out loud! :muack:
27 Jun 2007, 10:06 #5962
Anime Dad wrote:Got our kids' school reports yesterday: as expected, youngest daughter's was excellent, eldest daughter's was great but several teachers said she is too "social" in class, and son's was abysmal :grumble:

Sounds like a description of my niece vs. my two nephews.... :sweat:
27 Jun 2007, 10:09 #5963
Anime Dad wrote:Got our kids' school reports yesterday: as expected, youngest daughter's was excellent, eldest daughter's was great but several teachers said she is too "social" in class, and son's was abysmal :grumble:


How old is your son again? Boys in grade 10 and 11 (15-17 years old) tend to slack off in school because other things (like skateboarding, music, girls, etc.) take priority. It's not that they're dumb or just not "getting it", they just have no desire to learn. At this stage, they just can't think ahead. Totally normal.

Well, that's my observation as a teacher, anyways...
27 Jun 2007, 10:11 #5964
He's 16, and is not a scholar. He's got everything you described, plus a short attention span and a phobia about exams... and school anxiety: he actually regularly throws up in the mornings before school.
27 Jun 2007, 10:13 #5965
Anime Dad wrote:He's 16, and is not a scholar. He's got everything you described, plus a short attention span and a phobia about exams... and school anxiety: he actually regularly throws up in the mornings before school.


Hmmmm... how is he socially?
27 Jun 2007, 10:14 #5966
Time to get back on topic.................
27 Jun 2007, 21:30 #5967
Wynter wrote: It's not that they're dumb or just not "getting it", they just have no desire to learn. At this stage, they just can't think ahead. Totally normal.
Sounds just like me. So, , , does that mean I was "normal"??? THAT bothers me!!! [/list:u]
27 Jun 2007, 23:34 #5968
K.T.Tran wrote:this is buggin me quite a lot right now.

DLed stepmania to play and the some songs too just to get this little message.

[image]


I have no idea what to do in order to make it work either :shamefulcry: :shamefulcry:

Access violation usually means the program tried to access a memory address with crap in it. Bad memory pointer. It's due to bad programming or some weird error, like the new object wasn't created to due lack of memory.

Unless you have more data at the end of the text file, it looks like bad programming. The MSVCRT71 is MS Visual C++, "malloc" is a function to allocate memory and "new" is to create an object. It returns a memory address, if there was an error in the creation and the memory address is used, you'll have an access violation error.

There could also be a problem with the movie you're trying to load or a problem with the codec... :headscratch:
28 Jun 2007, 12:41 #5969
gaijinmark wrote: Sounds just like me. So, , , does that mean I was "normal"??? THAT bothers me!!! [/list:u]


I wouldn't count on it ;) :hehe:


OT: It's really annoying me - I'm as bored as hell at work, when I could be burning dramas to DVD at home. I've got a lot of burning to do. I could burn at work too, in fact I do, but it slows the comp down so much that I can only set one up to convert & burn overnight :grumble:
28 Jun 2007, 19:44 #5970
tabana wrote:
Access violation usually means the program tried to access a memory address with crap in it. Bad memory pointer. It's due to bad programming or some weird error, like the new object wasn't created to due lack of memory.

Unless you have more data at the end of the text file, it looks like bad programming. The MSVCRT71 is MS Visual C++, "malloc" is a function to allocate memory and "new" is to create an object. It returns a memory address, if there was an error in the creation and the memory address is used, you'll have an access violation error.

There could also be a problem with the movie you're trying to load or a problem with the codec... :headscratch:


oooohhhhh.......

now i'll just hope its bad programming.
If anything i'll just wait for the people who did this game to fix the problem....

Thanks for replying :mrgreen:
28 Jun 2007, 22:10 #5971
Anime Dad wrote:OT: It's really annoying me - I'm as bored as hell at work, when I could be burning dramas to DVD at home. I've got a lot of burning to do. I could burn at work too, in fact I do, but it slows the comp down so much that I can only set one up to convert & burn overnight :grumble:

You need a second PC. :victory:
28 Jun 2007, 22:51 #5972
K.T.Tran wrote:

oooohhhhh.......

now i'll just hope its bad programming.
If anything i'll just wait for the people who did this game to fix the problem....

Thanks for replying :mrgreen:

No problem. I tried the game a long time ago and it kept crashing on me too.

It's was more stable with the official songs and movies, but still couldn't beat DDR. :(



For me 4 simple words: Spice, Girls, reunion & tour. :bleh:
29 Jun 2007, 01:22 #5973
tabana wrote:
For me 4 simple words: Spice, Girls, reunion & tour. :bleh:


mmm i bet david beckham is highly amused! :ashamed:
29 Jun 2007, 01:36 #5974
tabana wrote:
For me 4 simple words: Spice, Girls, reunion & tour. :bleh:


I hear you.
I didn't like them the first time round. :grumble:
29 Jun 2007, 03:25 #5975
Keps wrote:

I hear you.
I didn't like them the first time round. :grumble:


I LOVED the Spice Girls! Well, not necessarily their music or "movie", but just the fact that they were SO entertaining!
29 Jun 2007, 05:59 #5976
bmwracer wrote:
You need a second PC. :victory:


I can just see the conversation between me and the boss: "Well, I really DO need another computer in my office...."
30 Jun 2007, 16:20 #5977
Wynter wrote:

I LOVED the Spice Girls! Well, not necessarily their music or "movie", but just the fact that they were SO entertaining!


Gulp! :hehe:
I think you meant to put quote marks round "music" in the above sentence, didn't you? :twisted:
30 Jun 2007, 23:12 #5978
Keps wrote:

Gulp! :hehe:
I think you meant to put quote marks round "music" in the above sentence, didn't you? :twisted:


as a pop act i thought they were ok. nothing more nothing less.
1 Jul 2007, 04:12 #5979
Keps wrote:

Gulp! :hehe:
I think you meant to put quote marks round "music" in the above sentence, didn't you? :twisted:


LOL! True say. Tho I do have two of their songs on my playlist... :sweat: :ashamed: :hehe:
1 Jul 2007, 07:49 #5980
my colds... *shiver* grrrrr... :beaten:

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.