What things bother you the most?

2 Jan 2006, 17:31 #1601

^ :rofl: and if you survive, ill do this. :bow: my masta! :hehe:

thanks qilver, hehe i found this somewhere, its cool all the characters are here too. :mrgreen:

3 Jan 2006, 10:55 #1602

gaijin mark wrote:I was at drive-thru at McDonald's and teh bonehead in front of me must have spent 5 minutes looking at the menu. You only got 3 choices right, burger, fish or chicken. What was he doing? Trying to find the wine list? :beatyou:

I know what you mean.
It's not as if the menu changes very frequently. And there are no "today's specials"..... stupid people.

4 Jan 2006, 01:02 #1603

KeepMeCaffein8td wrote:Rat wraps with faces.

[image]

Unnerving little rodents.

What the... ???

That's one the ugliest thing I've ever seen. :bleh:

The ugliest would be that 80 year old overweight grandma walking on the beach without her bikini top I saw 2 or 3 years ago. :bleh:

4 Jan 2006, 01:10 #1604

Tabana wrote:

The ugliest would be that 80 year old overweight grandma walking on the beach without her bikini top

Where was her husband wearing his speedo? :bleh:

4 Jan 2006, 01:50 #1605

yeah... Mr. speedo and Mrs. monokini.
I was sleeping on the beach and when I opened my eyes I saw this. Scary as hell. :bleh:

Some people look good with revealing clothes and some people don't. ...but when you're 80, nobody does. :bleh: I don't know what they were thinking.

4 Jan 2006, 01:56 #1606

tabana wrote:yeah... Mr. speedo and Mrs. monokini.
I was sleeping on the beach and when I opened my eyes I saw this. Scary as hell. :bleh:

Some people look good with revealing clothes and some people don't. ...but when you're 80, nobody does. :bleh: I don't know what they were thinking.

i once saw this fat girl in a mini skirt bending down in a pub. cellulite and thong don't mix!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :bleh: :hehe:

4 Jan 2006, 01:59 #1607

kenjilina wrote:

i once saw this fat girl in a mini skirt bending down in a pub. cellulite and thong don't mix!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :bleh: :hehe:

oh-my-god.

can somebody hold my hair back while i barf please.

4 Jan 2006, 02:18 #1608

littlemissfab wrote:

oh-my-god.

can somebody hold my hair back while i barf please.

i almost did. i'm sure in the u.s. you can file a lawsuit against such things! :hehe:

4 Jan 2006, 02:20 #1609

kenjilina wrote:

i almost did. i'm sure in the u.s. you can file a lawsuit against such things! :hehe:

yeah it's called negligent infliction of emotional distress......

4 Jan 2006, 02:21 #1610

Tu_triky wrote:

yeah it's called negligent infliction of emotional distress......

i'm on the phone to ally mcbeal right now! :hehe:

4 Jan 2006, 02:22 #1611

kenjilina wrote:

i'm on the phone to ally mcbeal right now! :hehe:

be careful, as frail as ally mcbeal is...the site of that cellulite might cause her to snap in two.

4 Jan 2006, 02:28 #1612

Tu_triky wrote:

yeah it's called negligent infliction of emotional distress......

hmmmm.. i know of "intentional infliction of emotional distress".. that is a tort.

the elements are:
(1) outrageous and extreme action by the defendant.

(2) the intent of the defendant to cause emotional distress;

(3) plaintiff suffering extreme emotional distress

(4) actual and proximate causation (the link) to the plaintiff's stress and the act of the defendant..

i'm trying to rack my brain if "negligent infliction of emotional distress" covers a third party + the closeness of the relationship of the plaintiff to the one done harm to.... i don't know.. i forgot.. I'll check my notes when i get home..

i don't know but i think those are pretty much the elements.. :rofl: nice thing to refresh my memory..

4 Jan 2006, 02:32 #1613

littlemissfab wrote:

hmmmm.. i know of "intentional infliction of emotional distress".. that is a tort.

the elements are:
(1) outrageous and extreme action by the defendant.

(2) the intent of the defendant to cause emotional distress;

(3) plaintiff suffering extreme emotional distress

(4) actual and proximate causation (the link) to the plaintiff's stress and the act of the defendant..

i'm trying to rack my brain if "negligent infliction of emotional distress" covers a third party + the closeness of the relationship of the plaintiff to the one done harm to.... i don't know.. i forgot.. I'll check my notes when i get home..

i don't know but i think those are pretty much the elements.. :rofl: nice thing to refresh my memory..

negligent infliction of emotional distress is also a tort but its under the umbrella of negligence it's not an intentional tort but it also requires causation

4 Jan 2006, 02:40 #1614

Tu_triky wrote:

negligent infliction of emotional distress is also a tort but its under the umbrella of negligence it's not an intentional tort but it also requires causation

negligence always requires causation.. elements for negligence per se

1. duty 2. breach of duty 3. causation 4. damages.

for the negligent infliction.. i think it has something to do with the shock value.. i remember the example being given was this drunk driver running a kid over with the mom watching.. the driver negligently inflicted emotional distress on the mom when he ran over the kid in front of her. It's like the mom can recover from that driver commting battery on the kid.. so it's def v. kid = battery & def v. mom = negligent infliction...

crap. i'm rambling.

but for the thong part of it.. dude.. that's not negligent.. that's intentional..

:rofl:

4 Jan 2006, 02:45 #1615

littlemissfab wrote:

but for the thong part of it.. dude.. that's not negligent.. that's intentional..

:rofl:

yeah right if you're foolish enough to look at a fat girl wearing a miniskirt i say she has a defense to negligence -- assumption of risk

4 Jan 2006, 02:47 #1616

Tu_triky wrote:

be careful, as frail as ally mcbeal is...the site of that cellulite might cause her to snap in two.

yeah, ultra skinny chix...:bleh:

4 Jan 2006, 02:48 #1617

Tu_triky wrote:

yeah right if you're foolish enough to look at a fat girl wearing a miniskirt i say she has a defense to negligence -- assumption of risk

WAHAHAHAHAHA.. assumption of risk.. wthell..

but it's not a full defense though.. so people like us can still recover..

*shudders*

4 Jan 2006, 02:49 #1618

littlemissfab wrote:

WAHAHAHAHAHA.. assumption of risk.. wthell..

but it's not a full defense though.. so people like us can still recover..

*shudders*

yeah you might recover the thong with an autograph on it...to memorialize the painful memory.

4 Jan 2006, 07:33 · edited #1619

tabana wrote:What the... ???
That's one the ugliest thing I've ever seen. :bleh:

wait, who's ugly? actually jin isnt ugly, hes so pretty i think hes prettier than me :hehe: but anyhoo, boybands cant rap.. thats all. :rolleyes:

4 Jan 2006, 07:35 #1620

MixxDreamer wrote:wait, who's ugly? actually jin isnt ugly, hes so pretty i think hes prettier than me :hehe: but anyhoo, boybands cant rap.. thats all. :rolleyes:

agree on jin. he's not handsome. he's goddarn pretty.

on the rapping part... errrrrrrr... :puppydog:

General Discussion Page 81 of 642