gaijinmark wrote:
If you made that list 10 years ago, you would have had to include Gino Cappelletti . The price of success, I guess.
Cappelletti is a good choice; I probably would have chosen Mike Haynes as well to fill the second open slot.
Started by Geezer · 17 Aug 2004 · 4,773 replies
gaijinmark wrote:
If you made that list 10 years ago, you would have had to include Gino Cappelletti . The price of success, I guess.
suzzy wrote:I have a question what is the the point-after-attempt. ?? I don't get it ? can some one explain :confused: :confused:
bmwracer wrote:ok why is Bill(Patriots coach) so upset over it ?? if its just that ...here the article
That's the extra point kick after a team scores a touchdown.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Bill-Belichick-wants-the-extra-point-to-die?urn=nfl-wp5693
Bill Belichick wants the extra point to die
By MJD
This is my favorite thing to come out of the conversation about the new kickoff rules. Bill Belichick used a kickoff question to move the conversation toward the extra point, and argued that it should be eliminated from the game, or at least greatly modified.
"Philosophically, plays that are non-plays shouldn't be in the game. I don't think it is good for the game. Extra points, when the odds are 99 percent range in extra points it is not a play. Let's move the ball back to the 15-20 yard line and not make it a tap in. Let them kick it. Same thing with the kickoff return, if you're just going to put the ball on the 20, put the ball on the 20."
(Applause.)
Given my druthers, I'd eliminate it completely -- I don't think you'd see a lot of kicks missed from the 15 or 20, either. It saves time, it speeds the game along, and the guy in the end-zone seats with the John 3:16 sign doesn't get time to prepare for his close-up.
This is the MJD plan: Let's just make touchdowns worth seven, and if someone wants to risk a point either way, they'll have the option to trot the ball out to the 2-point conversion spot, and they'll get eight points for their touchdown if they convert, six if they don't. Hell, I say we move that back, too. I think the 6-yard-line sounds about right.
I'm with him on the kickoff, too. I'll talk more about this later, but Belichick is right. If what the NFL wants is more touchbacks, then why go halfway? Put the ball on the 20. Put it on the 25 or 30 if you want to. I'm not saying I'm anti-kickoff, I'm just saying that if the league just wants drives to start at the 20, there are ways to do that that are more efficient.
Hmm. This Belichick character. I think he might be a smart one.
shin2 wrote: But no other coach has even taken teams to three consecutive Super Bowls.
shin2 wrote:I loved watching the Miami Dolphins of the early 70's play. I think those teams from 1971--1973 (three consecutive Super Bowl appearances, back-to-back Super Bowl victories) are underrated by both pundits and the public, even with their 1972 perfect season.
gaijinmark wrote:Finished reading a book about Gerald Ford recently, I guess we'll apply to you the quote that Lyndon Johnson had about Ford: "He's a nice guy. Just spent a little bit too much time playing football without a helmet." :P
Geezer wrote:shin2
re: Bills Mt. Rushmore. How can you leave off Jack Kemp?
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/661101-crazy-canton-cuts-jack-kemp
I know it was in the AFL days, but they were the Bills, and Kemp's teams won a bunch of the Championship games they got into.
Geezer wrote:quickie re: Madden
It's still great fun to listen to him on the radio up here. He's been doing a ten minute show/chat on KCBS News radio for the last... 100 years. Just him, on the phone from his home, chatting about football, or crabgrass, with guys at the station that he's known for years. No pressure, no boom no bombast.
I don't know if I could actually start a day without hearing from the Coach first thing.
Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.