JDorama.com

Concerns, Questions, Suggestions To The Moderators?

Started by Helene · 19 Aug 2004 · 373 replies

Suggestions & Announcements Page 14 of 19

27 Jun 2007, 23:34 #261
jess wrote:To prevent irrelevant new threads from being started, how about changing the "announcement-posting guidelines" in each section to "Read this before you post/start a new thread" in a bigger font and brighter font colour?

There apparently isn't a feature to do that as far as I know, else the Admin would've done it already.... At least I hope he would have. :sweat:
27 Jun 2007, 23:48 #262
bmwracer wrote:
There apparently isn't a feature to do that as far as I know, else the Admin would've done it already.... At least I hope he would have. :sweat:


wow you reply fast. are you here 24/7 or sth haha :hehe:

hmm i suggest for the title to be changed to "READ THIS BEFORE YOU START A NEW THREAD" then. I think "posting guidelines" is not strong enough to catch the attention of newbies to this forum :hehe: haha hopefully this will lighten the workload of you moderators
28 Jun 2007, 00:13 #263
I think he is some sort of computer AI program running on the server. :hehe: :P

What I'd love is either something like you have to visit the guidelines thread before posting or a posting count limit before creating new threads. It doesn't have to be high, 5 is enough, but it should clean up 98% of the crap.
28 Jun 2007, 02:30 #264
jess wrote:wow you reply fast. are you here 24/7 or sth haha :hehe:

More like 18/7. :beaten:

hmm i suggest for the title to be changed to "READ THIS BEFORE YOU START A NEW THREAD" then. I think "posting guidelines" is not strong enough to catch the attention of newbies to this forum :hehe: haha hopefully this will lighten the workload of you moderators

Well there's more to the guidelines than just starting new threads: stuff about content, signatures, avatars, etc... "Posting Guidelines" is more generic and all-encompassing.

Having a bold font or blinking would be cool, but again, it's up to the Admin... :sweat:
19 Jul 2007, 01:35 #265
Hi Moderator

....hope i am posting this to the right column.

duplicate entry for drama 1183 and 1174

cheers
20 Jul 2007, 02:02 #268
Wynter wrote:
That means it's been tagged to be taken care of. :thumbsup:

I had no doubts. :applaud: :bow:
29 Jul 2007, 19:32 #269
A top 50 drama list based on the votes and not the number of votes would be nice, just a thought =)
30 Jul 2007, 00:51 #270
alesan wrote:A top 50 drama list based on the votes and not the number of votes would be nice, just a thought =)

Ehhh? :headscratch:
30 Jul 2007, 03:22 #271
alesan wrote:A top 50 drama list based on the votes and not the number of votes would be nice, just a thought =)


Erm... can you clarify? Do you mean based on the actual comments when voting instead of the number?

That would be impossible because it would take forever to go through them all that way... :sweat:
30 Jul 2007, 04:42 #272
Wynter wrote:Erm... can you clarify? Do you mean based on the actual comments when voting instead of the number?

Total comment count isn't that much better than the votes.

The entire Top 50 should be scrapped... It's pointless.
30 Jul 2007, 04:45 #273
bmwracer wrote:
Total comment count isn't that much better than the votes.

The entire Top 50 should be scrapped... It's pointless.


Yea, I'm in agreement. There are only a rare few that deserve to be up there.
30 Jul 2007, 04:53 #274
Wynter wrote:Yea, I'm in agreement. There are only a rare few that deserve to be up there.

Yup.

Maybe the fangirls and fanboys will go in the trash along with the Top 50 lists. :fingerscrossed:
30 Jul 2007, 04:59 #275
bmwracer wrote:
Yup.

Maybe the fangirls and fanboys will go in the trash along with the Top 50 lists. :fingerscrossed:


I wonder how many of the 30446 members are actually active.
30 Jul 2007, 05:09 #276
Wynter wrote:I wonder how many of the 30446 members are actually active.

If you take a look at who posts day in and day out, I'd say less than 100 or so.

Hmm, I wonder if this phpBB software can acquire those kind of statistics... You'd think it could...
30 Jul 2007, 21:23 #277
oh sorry what I mean is a list based on the average of all the votes.
30 Jul 2007, 23:23 #278
alesan wrote:oh sorry what I mean is a list based on the average of all the votes.


What do you mean?
31 Jul 2007, 02:33 #279
alesan wrote:oh sorry what I mean is a list based on the average of all the votes.

That seems to still be dependent on the number of votes, ne? :headscratch:
31 Jul 2007, 05:51 #280
ex.

GTO gets the following votes: 9,8,7,8 which gives us the average: 8

Hero gets: 10,7,10 which gives us the average: 9

Summer Snow gets: 10,10,10,10,9 and average 9.8

The List will be:
1.Summer Snow
2.Hero
3.GTO

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.