JDorama.com

Politics/Elections/World News

Started by pcmodem · 6 Oct 2004 · 1,480 replies

General Discussion Page 71 of 75

3 Nov 2010, 12:49 #1401
bmwracer wrote:
Yup.

Everything that was said about Whitman in the article was exactly what she projected: A total lack of sincerity.


All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Whitman together again
4 Nov 2010, 04:51 #1402
bmwracer wrote:Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer are the projected winners in California.

Sayonara, Meg and Carly... Find some consolation in your millions. :P


Interesting to see Gavin Newsom, popular mayor of SF, lieutenant governor elect, effectively in tutelage under Jerry. :)
4 Nov 2010, 04:59 #1403
Itazura ichiban wrote:Interesting to see Gavin Newsom, popular mayor of SF, lieutenant governor elect, effectively in tutelage under Jerry. :)

Yup... If Jerry steps down after four, Newsom would most likely be the front runner for the Dems.
4 Nov 2010, 05:03 #1404
bmwracer wrote:
Yup... If Jerry steps down after four, Newsom would most likely be the front runner for the Dems.


Well Newsom WAS going to run this election cycle but he was too busy boning a woman that wasn't his wife so he had to wave off his bid for governor.
4 Nov 2010, 05:18 #1405
Tu_triky wrote:Well Newsom WAS going to run this election cycle but he was too busy boning a woman that wasn't his wife so he had to wave off his bid for governor.

Really?

I'm surprised he won Lt. Governor then.... And that his opponent didn't play that up.
4 Nov 2010, 05:22 #1406
bmwracer wrote:
Really?

I'm surprised he won Lt. Governor then.... And that his opponent didn't play that up.


Yeah he got busy with his secretary back in 2007. Look up Gavin newsoom affair and you'll see references to it.
4 Nov 2010, 05:40 #1407
Tu_triky wrote:Yeah he got busy with his secretary back in 2007. Look up Gavin newsoom affair and you'll see references to it.

I guess his opponent did have the funds to go there... It'll be different when he tries to run for the top of the ticket. :sweat:
4 Nov 2010, 05:42 #1408
bmwracer wrote:
I guess his opponent did have the funds to go there... It'll be different when he tries to run for the top of the ticket. :sweat:


I think that's precisely it. Not as much scrutiny for the Lt. Governor's race, so he was able to get in there like swimwear.
25 Nov 2010, 02:11 #1409
Newsom just wasn't that widely recognized throughout the state is all. Though the image of extramarital sex is certainly titillating. :hehe:

So what are we going to do about Korea?
25 Nov 2010, 02:23 #1410
Itazura ichiban wrote:So what are we going to do about Korea?

I'm sure we have subs in the area... Turn a key, press a button, Poof!, no more North Korea.
25 Nov 2010, 02:28 #1411
bmwracer wrote:
I'm sure we have subs in the area... Turn a key, press a button, Poof!, no more North Korea.


The carrier strike group led by the USS Washington is the area as well as numerous other vessels...but we aren't going to do anything...not to say that we should.

Having said that we have dispatched the SS Minnow to conduct surveillance.
25 Nov 2010, 02:33 #1412
Tu_triky wrote:Having said that we have dispatched the SS Minnow to conduct surveillance.

On a three-hour tour, right? :mrgreen:
25 Nov 2010, 06:17 #1413
bmwracer wrote:
On a three-hour tour, right? :mrgreen:


Hehe. Yes. Afterward Gilligan will make a landing at Inchon to emulate MacArthur during the war.
25 Nov 2010, 06:46 #1414
Tu_triky wrote:Hehe. Yes. Afterward Gilligan will make a landing at Inchon to emulate MacArthur during the war.

Haha.

Hope someone takes pictures.
25 Nov 2010, 06:55 #1415
bmwracer wrote:
Haha.

Hope someone takes pictures.


Gilligan even carved his own pipe out of driftwood and coconuts.
25 Nov 2010, 10:14 #1416
bmwracer wrote:
I'm sure we have subs in the area... Turn a key, press a button, Poof!, no more North Korea.


Why would we attack North Korea, we're bound to them by treaty. Well according to Sarah Palin. :beaten:

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2010/11/sarah-palin-north-korean-allies-gaffe.html
25 Nov 2010, 13:14 #1417
Jav_sol wrote:Why would we attack North Korea, we're bound to them by treaty. Well according to Sarah Palin. :beaten:

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2010/11/sarah-palin-north-korean-allies-gaffe.html

Don't get me started on her... She's an attention whore to the nth degree. :bleh:
26 Nov 2010, 05:05 #1418
bmwracer wrote:
Don't get me started on her... She's an attention whore to the nth degree. :bleh:

Just like every other politician. Especially that president guy who believes that the US has 57 states.

They are all the same. Power hungry asshats hell bent on ruining us all.
26 Nov 2010, 13:38 #1419
Edohiguma wrote:Just like every other politician.

Thing is, she's not even a politician... Just pretending to be one.
30 Nov 2010, 04:52 #1420
Edohiguma wrote:
Just like every other politician. Especially that president guy who believes that the US has 57 states.

They are all the same. Power hungry asshats hell bent on ruining us all.


57! So he got the USA confused with Heinz catsup, big deal. :crazy:

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.