Photography/Digital Cameras
Started by Nacho · 2 Nov 2004 · 248 replies
General Discussion
^ I don't think they sell Instamatic film any more... :sweat:
bmwracer wrote:^ I don't think they sell Instamatic film any more... :sweat:
Really? I'm still using wet plate glass negatives to produce my photos.
Tu_triky wrote:Really? I'm still using wet plate glass negatives to produce my photos.
Ahh... Ansel Adams old school. :victory:
bmwracer wrote:
Ahh... Ansel Adams old school. :victory:
I have a lot of old plate glass lying around.
Tu_triky wrote:I have a lot of old plate glass lying around.
And the accompanying film emulsion as well...? :P
bmwracer wrote:
And the accompanying film emulsion as well...? :P
Brew my own in a witch's cauldron out back.
That 5K camera is crazy tho'.
Tu_triky wrote:Brew my own in a witch's cauldron out back.
Nothing like home made. :mrgreen:
That 5K camera is crazy tho'.
Yup... But the tech is absolutely fascinating. :victory:
bmwracer wrote:
Yup... But the tech is absolutely fascinating. :victory:
Top dollar = top tech.
Tu_triky wrote:Top dollar = top tech.
Yup, that applies to everything.... :sweat:
bmwracer wrote:
Yup, that applies to everything.... :sweat:
No doubt. It's nice to window shop sometimes even when you're not in the market.
Tu_triky wrote:No doubt. It's nice to window shop sometimes even when you're not in the market.
Yup, it's about all you can do... :sweat:
Sony A77 is almost here... jsut a couple more months...
Here's the rumored specs
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr5-first-worldwide-picture-of-the-final-a77-and-a65-production-models/
Since I own an SLT-A33, the EVF is not a disadvantage for me (compared to OVF) as I rather want to see the picture the way the sensor sees it.
Since its WYSIWYG, its easier to use... imo.
Here's the rumored specs
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr5-first-worldwide-picture-of-the-final-a77-and-a65-production-models/
Since I own an SLT-A33, the EVF is not a disadvantage for me (compared to OVF) as I rather want to see the picture the way the sensor sees it.
Since its WYSIWYG, its easier to use... imo.
Interesting site - she mainly takes photos of objects/ppl that appears to be levitating...
http://yowayowacamera.com/
http://yowayowacamera.com/
You should check out this site: http://www.lytro.com/
Heard about it on the news... Interesting technology.
Heard about it on the news... Interesting technology.
bmwracer wrote:You should check out this site: http://www.lytro.com/
Heard about it on the news... Interesting technology.
Heard abotut that from a friend as well...
You could simulate it with software though - a lot more cheaper approach. :hehe:
As long as you take photos like point-and-shoot cameras (in dlsr it would be aperture mode with f>20), you'll get mostly photos with dof to infinity.
Then, you can use most graphics software to select which part you want to leave untouched and blur everything else.
Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.