Tu_triky wrote:
You couldn't see "anything" but it was a very provocative photo shoot from an editorial standpoint. I don't wanna go off topic but here's one pic from the shoot that I found real quick, just to give you an idea:
[image]
but you know, I can also see it from a marketing perspective...if you have an uber sexy actor fully nude with the audience being teased by the skin that is being shown, it's GREAT publicity and advertising, making the producers of the magazine filthy rich! Nice tactic on their part.