WD wrote:
I'm not sure why Ryo is kept in 2 groups, but I guess it must be Ryo's choice to stay with Kanjani8. He was pretty sad when he found out he was to debut with NEWS first.
Fye, Ryo was with Kanjani8 first.
Kanjani8 formed - December 2002
NEWS formed and debuted - November 2003
Kanjani8 debuted nationwide - September 2004
oh..gomen ne~~I thought Ryo was with News first :bow:
WD wrote:
In one TV show in 2006, when Yoko & Subaru were asked about NEWS' formation and debut, they were all pretty upset because Ryo (and Uchi) was taken away from them and put into NEWS. They actually thought that it would be the end of Kanjani8, and right after NEWS debuted, I think the members had somehow lost the drive to continue with being a group, what's with Ryo & Uchi constantly traveling to Tokyo and left Kanjani8 with just the 6 of them. However, they kinda persevered because they still had a TV show going on at that time (Honjani).
i think i've heard about this somewhere. in Ohkura's interview premium (i forgot what the show is :sweat: ), he also mentioned the same thing.
WD wrote:
In August 2004, right during their rehearsal for their annual summer play, Ryo told everybody in Kanjani8, "Let's try again together one more time. Mou ichido ganbare!" Ryo reportedly cried at that time (I assume because he missed being with Eito so much), and Yoko & Subaru confirmed in that TV show that everyone else also cried when they heard Ryo said that. So I guess ultimately, Ryo (and Uchi) themselves decided to stay with Kanjani8, and after a while I think Johnny himself intervened sop that Eito can debut nationwide that September (although it didn't seem like Julie & Mary, the person in charge of JE since 2002) wanted Eito to debut. Probably that's why they only released Eito's first single, Naniwa Iroha Bushi in Kansai only that August 2004, but when it hit the chart at no.1 and became a hit, JE management finally realized that Eito have a major fanbase and consequently released the single nationwide in the following September.
my eyes teary again now :mecry: :mecry: :mecry:
WD wrote:
Fuh that's pretty long! :mrgreen:
ne ne~~I think that is too short. You can explain much more longer than this one. Like you explain to me before :woot: