Movies! Movies! Movies! (Non-Japanese)

Started by blender1184 · 29 Jun 2005 · 5,013 replies

General Discussion Page 179 of 251

4 Jun 2008, 03:41 #3561
Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins

Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins is an upcoming science fiction action film set for release on May 22, 2009. Directed by McG, it is the fourth film in the Terminator franchise and stars Christian Bale as John Connor, Anton Yelchin as Kyle Reese, and Sam Worthington as the new character Marcus Wright. The film is set in 2018, focusing on the war between humanity and Skynet. It abandons the formula of the series (Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Model 101 Terminator time traveling to the present to protect or kill someone of future importance), and the film will be rated PG-13, unlike the other films. Filming began on May 5, 2008.
4 Jun 2008, 03:49 #3562
bmwracer wrote:Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins

Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins is an upcoming science fiction action film set for release on May 22, 2009. Directed by McG, it is the fourth film in the Terminator franchise and stars Christian Bale as John Connor, Anton Yelchin as Kyle Reese, and Sam Worthington as the new character Marcus Wright. The film is set in 2018, focusing on the war between humanity and Skynet. It abandons the formula of the series (Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Model 101 Terminator time traveling to the present to protect or kill someone of future importance), and the film will be rated PG-13, unlike the other films. Filming began on May 5, 2008.


Arnold will make a cameo appearance in this movie as an older model cyborg....stalwart and true, production still of Arnold below:

[image]
4 Jun 2008, 03:51 #3563
Tu_triky wrote:Arnold will make a cameo appearance in this movie as an older model cyborg....stalwart and true, production still of Arnold below:

[image]

LOL. :hehe:

"Danger, John Connor, Danger...!!!" :rofl:
4 Jun 2008, 03:54 #3564
bmwracer wrote:
LOL. :hehe:

"Danger, John Connor, Danger...!!!" :rofl:


Takes a lickin' and keeps on tickin'.

:hehe:
8 Jun 2008, 02:47 #3565
Iron Man's Repulsors Set on The Mandarin for Sequel
By John Scott Lewinski
June 07, 2008

[image]

With the Incredible Hulk tracking surprisingly well and threatening to smash Iron Man's box office records next weekend, director Jon Favreau is keeping Tony Stark and company in the news by hinting at the plot of the Iron Man sequel.

When the original film made mention of the terrorist organization The 10 Rings, it was a clear reference to Marvel history and the alien artifacts The Mandarin discovered before beginning his career of oppression and supervillainy. It seemed like a pretty obvious clue from Favreau and his writers that Iron Man's arch-nemesis would appear in a sequel.

Now, with the director saying he needs "heavy duty, heavyweight bad guys" to confront Iron Man in the next film, Mandarin seems all but a lock. There's no mention of casting yet for the Far Eastern troublemaker, but that will have to break soon, as Robert Downey Jr. will be ready to begin filming in the golden titanium suit again when he finishes the Hugh Hefner biography he's working on now.
8 Jun 2008, 03:17 #3566
Indiana in Japan....my, my, my.

Jonesing for Indy in Tokyo

[image]
8 Jun 2008, 03:23 #3567
Tu_triky wrote:
[image]


Looks like they started filming for Indiana 5

Indiana Jones and the Archeologist Cosplay Cafe

I believe this scene is where the naughty natives are lined up for some spanking.
8 Jun 2008, 03:26 #3568
krim wrote:

Looks like they started filming for Indiana 5

Indiana Jones and the Archeologist Cosplay Cafe


:lol: :rofl: :lol:
8 Jun 2008, 08:51 #3569
krim wrote:Looks like they started filming for Indiana 5

Indiana Jones and the Archeologist Cosplay Cafe

I believe this scene is where the naughty natives are lined up for some spanking.

LOl, the famous bullwhip will be really handy here... :beaten: :hehe:
8 Jun 2008, 09:00 #3570
I saw the new Indy file until Ford stumbles into that freaky mannequin town. Then we had to leave. :shakehead:

I'll try again tomorrow.
8 Jun 2008, 09:19 #3571
Wynter wrote:I saw the new Indy file until Ford stumbles into that freaky mannequin town. Then we had to leave. :shakehead:

I'll try again tomorrow.

Had to leave? :headscratch:


The freaky mannequin town was a nuclear test site. :sweat:
8 Jun 2008, 09:34 #3572
bmwracer wrote:
Had to leave? :headscratch:


The freaky mannequin town was a nuclear test site. :sweat:


LOL! So that's what it was...

It was really hard for me to hear anything. :sweat:
8 Jun 2008, 11:42 #3573
Wynter wrote:It was really hard for me to hear anything. :sweat:

Ehh? :headscratch:
14 Jun 2008, 21:30 #3574
just saw P.S I Love You

looks like a bunch of mommies gave it a 10 in imdb. a little overrated. it was a really touching chick flick, but not a tear jerker, and definitely not worth the theater experience. just rent the dvd and watch it with your husband at home
14 Jun 2008, 21:41 #3575
@Monta: That's what I was told about PS I love you too.

Watched What happens in Vegas last night. It was entertaining and very funny, quite predictable but recommended. :)

[image]
22 Jun 2008, 23:40 #3576
i just saw the rubbish called Cloverfield. and now my eyes hurt. literally hurt. the whole stupid documentary shaky camera style thing. this movie is crap. seriously. there barely was a story, every line said by the casts are completely annoying, and please you can barely see a thing so how can you call that shitty monster cool (i think i saw something like it in a Pokemon trading card). this is probably the worst movie i've ever seen.

Lifo wrote:
Watched What happens in Vegas last night. It was entertaining and very funny, quite predictable but recommended. :)


isn't every Vegas movie? they probably got screwed up by sex and money
23 Jun 2008, 22:15 #3577
I haven't seen Love Guru, nor do I intend to, but by all accounts these reviews are funnier than the actual movie:

Dana Stevens in Slate: gcthe most joy-draining 88 minutes Ifve ever spent outside a hospital waiting roomc itfs about as much fun as a tour of someonefs large intestine.h [Slate]

A.O. Scott in The New York Times: gTo say that the movie is not funny is merely to affirm the obvious. The word eunfunnyfc does not quite capture the strenuous unpleasantness of his performance. No, eThe Love Guruf is downright antifunny, an experience that makes you wonder if you will ever laugh again.h [The New York Times]

Harry Knowles of Ainft It Cool News: gWith this film, Myers puts a shotgun in the mouth of comedy and kills it. This isnft merely a bad film, but a painful experience that you keep telling yourself to leavec one of the most inept pathetic terrifyingly awful experiences Ifve ever suffered through.h [Ainft It Cool News]
23 Jun 2008, 22:23 #3578
Tu_triky wrote:I haven't seen Love Guru, nor do I intend to, but by all accounts these reviews are funnier than the actual movie:

Dana Stevens in Slate: gcthe most joy-draining 88 minutes Ifve ever spent outside a hospital waiting roomc itfs about as much fun as a tour of someonefs large intestine.h [Slate]

:lol: :lol: :lol:

That made my day... :victory: :hehe: :rofl:

From the trailers I saw in the theater, I knew that this was a loser... And why is Myers always pairing himself up with that midget, er, little person?
23 Jun 2008, 22:40 #3579
bmwracer wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

That made my day... :victory: :hehe: :rofl:


Darn funny I must say. :hehe: Made me laugh too.


From the trailers I saw in the theater, I knew that this was a loser... And why is Myers always pairing himself up with that midget, er, little person?


I dunno, his schtick is tired, man...he basically made the same movie he did 5 years ago...you can only go to the same well so many times.
23 Jun 2008, 22:44 #3580
Tu_triky wrote:I dunno, his schtick is tired, man...he basically made the same movie he did 5 years ago...you can only go to the same well so many times.

Now if only those folks doing Gokusen would learn... :grumble:

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.