Celebrity Stuff (Non-Japanese)

Agreed I didn't find him guilty at all these people just wanted money. I mean come on lady state the facts if you knew this was happening would you have let it carry on as you long as you said it was.

K.T.Tran wrote:
Jus wondering, how many of you guys thought he was guilty???
I didn't think it :victory:

Well, the conspiracy charge was, I thought, dead in the water from the very beginning. The molestation charge and the giving alcohol to a minor could have gone either way. You set yourself up by allowing kids to sleep in the same bed. But to say it happened beyond a reasonable doubt was stretching it based on what I've been hearing in the media.

:shakehead: Amazing. Money buys the big time lawyers. The big time lawyers shape the media coverage. And the media coverage has people saying things like... well, he's just a big kid, and the people who accused him of doing something wrong were just after money. Right.

K.T.Tran wrote:Jus wondering, how many of you guys thought he was guilty???
I didn't think it :victory:

Well, from what I read about this case, I had serious doubts about the charges, and the motives of the accusers. So I'd vote for not guilty.

Geezer wrote::shakehead:

hahahah ... love that response.. with no words.

could mean just about any damn thing

I thought he was going to jail for sure. O wells....

z123_us wrote:

hahahah ... love that response.. with no words.

could mean just about any damn thing

Yeah, I noticed that when I looked back, so I edited it. I didn't want people to think I thought the guy was not guilty.

Geezer wrote:

Yeah, I noticed that when I looked back, so I edited it. I didn't want people to think I thought the guy was not guilty.

hahah :thumbsup: .... lucky me .. got u before the edit :hehe:

but i did think .. they wld get him for some charges atleast .. maybe the lower alcohol ones ....

but well $$$ .. runs the world ... in reality

in dorama ... it is love and :blahblah:

but then we all love to dream in daylight right!

Geezer wrote:

Yeah, I noticed that when I looked back, so I edited it. I didn't want people to think I thought the guy was not guilty.

I think the problem is the "prove beyond a reasonable doubt." There's no doubt in my mind that questionable things occurred, but to what extent? I don't know. You have to admit the prosecution witnesses definitely didn't help their cause.

dochira wrote:
I think the problem is the "prove beyond a reasonable doubt." There's no doubt in my mind that questionable things occurred, but to what extent? I don't know. You have to admit the prosecution witnesses definitely didn't help their cause.

yeah i was watchin bbc/cnn ... they also said .. that in such cases the responsibility is with the prosecution to prove their case more than the defense to turn it

and well as we all know now ... the so callled victims family was hardly reliable at all.

yeh im really happy too! f*ck off who critisizes him, im glad he proved all of you wrong. just let him be. :dancing:

From Michael owns words. What is wrong with a grown man (over 40) who wants to share his bed with little boys. He is guilty as hell. Jacko is quilty as hell. This will not be the last time we here of Jacko molestiing little boys.

I sure would not let my kids go over to Neverland and see Jacko. This is my opinion and I am sticking to it. Use to be a big fan of his but not anymore.

z123_us wrote:

my dear my love ... u might wanna edit your message

"he was found guilty " ??? :hehe:

hahaha my bad!
i was in a rush to celebrate, and blast mj from my stereo!

TANG wrote:
hahaha my bad!
i was in a rush to celebrate, and blast mj from my stereo!

i'm baaad I'm baaad ... :hehe:

yeah! your so mean! :shamefulcry:
lol :victory:

I think MJ is as strange as can be. And talented as well.

I feel the poor freak is the ultimate target for every skanky blackmailer around.

I also think he is totally asexual which means a resounding:

NOT GUILTY from me!!

Michael Jackson is innocent--just like OJ and Robert Blake!!! They're all innocent!!

Another 5-10 years will we see another alligation charge, I presume.
:rolleyes:

My guess is that we wont see anyomer allegations. Basically, because I think that he might become a... ... I can't even say it... forgive me! He might become a reclusive individual and shun the rest of the world by saying, "look what you did to me, how could you? You're never gonna hear from me again!"
Which would mean I'll never get to go to neverland! It's not fair! :puppydog:

Let's hope that he doesn't though.. Yey! :woot:

Let's have three cheers for Mikey!

Hip hip...

Horaaaay!

seppydude wrote:My guess is that we wont see anyomer allegations. Basically, because I think that he might become a... ... I can't even say it... forgive me! He might become a reclusive individual and shun the rest of the world by saying, "look what you did to me, how could you? You're never gonna hear from me again!"
Which would mean I'll never get to go to neverland! It's not fair! :puppydog:

Let's hope that he doesn't though.. Yey! :woot:

Let's have three cheers for Mikey!

Hip hip...

Horaaaay!

my BET ... the one thing he wld never do is become reclusive now .. with all the media and coverage he has got ...and now with the sympathy vote

for a businessman like him ...it is $$$$ time .