Bits of random facts

Started by lifunk · 15 Nov 2005 · 1,423 replies

General Discussion Page 55 of 72

26 Dec 2006, 01:23 #1081
From Wikipedia:

"Xmas" and "X-mas" are common abbreviations of the word "Christmas". They are sometimes pronounced "eksmas", but they, and variants such as "Xtemass", originated as handwriting abbreviations for the pronunciation "Christmas". The "-mas" part came from the Anglo-Saxon for "festival", "religious event": Crīstesmæsse or Crīstemæsse. This abbreviation is widely but not universally accepted; some view it as demeaning to Christ, whilst others find it a helpful abbreviation.

The word "Christ" and its compounds, including "Christmas", have been abbreviated for at least the past 1,000 years, long before the modern "Xmas" was commonly used. "Christ" was often written as "XP" or "Xt"; there are references in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as far back as 1021 AD. This X and P arose as the uppercase forms of the Greek letters ƒÔ and ƒÏ), used in ancient abbreviations for ƒ´ƒÏƒÇƒÐƒÑƒÍς (Greek for "Christ") (see Labarum), and are still widely seen in many Eastern Orthodox icons depicting Jesus Christ.

Some people believe that the term is part of an effort to "take Christ out of Christmas" or to literally "cross out Christ";[citation needed] it is also seen as evidence of the secularization of Christmas, as a symptom of the commercialization of the holiday (as the abbreviation has long been used by retailers). It may also be used as a vehicle to be more inclusive, see political correctness.

The occasionally felt belief that the "X" represents the cross Christ was crucified on has no basis in fact; regardless, St Andrew's Cross is X-shaped, but Christ's cross was probably shaped like a T or a õ. Indeed, X-as-chi was associated with Christ long before X-as-cross could be, since the cross as a Christian symbol developed later. (The Greek letter Chi ƒ´ stood for "Christ" in the ancient Greek acrostic ƒ§ƒ´ƒ¦ƒ²ƒ° ichthys.) While some see the spelling of Christmas as Xmas a threat, others see it as a way to honor the martyrs. The use of X as an abbreviation for "cross" in modern abbreviated writing (e.g. "Kings X" for "Kings Cross") may have reinforced this assumption.

In ancient Christian art ƒÔ and ƒÔƒÏ are abbreviations for Christ's name.[citation needed] In many manuscripts of the New Testament and icons, X is an abbreviation for Christos, as is XC (the first and last letters in Greek, using the lunate sigma); compare IC for Jesus in Greek. The Oxford English Dictionary documents the use of this abbreviation back to 1551, 50 years before the first English colonists arrived in North America and 60 years before the King James Version of the Bible was completed. At the same time, Xian and Xianity were in frequent use as abbreviations of "Christian" and "Christianity"; and nowadays still are sometimes so used, but much less than "Xmas". The proper names containing the name "Christ" other than aforementioned are rarely abbreviated in this way (e.g. Hayden Xensen for the actor name "Hayden Christensen"). Pop artist Christina Aguilera is known to spell her first name as 'Xtina'.

This apparent usage of "X" to spell the syllable "kris" (rather than the sounds "ks") has extended to "xtal" for "crystal", and on florists' signs "xant" for "chrysanthemum"[citation needed] (though these words are not etymologically related to "Christ"; "crystal" comes from a Greek word meaning "ice", and "chrysanthemum" from Greek words meaning "golden flower", while "Christ" comes from a Greek word meaning "anointed").

In the animated television show Futurama, which is set in the 31st century, Xmas is the official name for the day formerly known as Christmas (which has become an "archaic pronunciation").
26 Dec 2006, 01:34 #1082
^
Nice info. :) As usual, wikipedia comes to the rescue. :hehe: But I'd still go for the more specific, english letter/word, and the will of the catholic church. :bonk: I rest my case.
26 Dec 2006, 01:55 #1083
Saito_Hajime wrote:^
Nice info. :) As usual, wikipedia comes to the rescue. :hehe: But I'd still go for the more specific, english letter/word, and the will of the catholic church. :bonk: I rest my case.


Yup. As far as I'm concerned, it requires very little effort to write the entire
"Christ" out for Christmas.
26 Dec 2006, 11:55 #1084
Wynter wrote:Yup. As far as I'm concerned, it requires very little effort to write the entire "Christ" out for Christmas.

Yeah, but people can't even type out "you" (u), "for" (4), and "don't" (dun), among others.... :shakehead:
26 Dec 2006, 13:49 #1085
bmwracer wrote:
Yeah, but people can't even type out "you" (u), "for" (4), and "don't" (dun), among others.... :shakehead:


LOL! So true! :bow: I worked with a teacher a few years back who taught a unit in "Online Chat: The next language" or whatever. She was trying to convince me that English writing was evolving into what we now have as textmessaging. I didn't buy it.
26 Dec 2006, 21:43 #1086
Wynter wrote:

LOL! So true! :bow: I worked with a teacher a few years back who taught a unit in "Online Chat: The next language" or whatever. She was trying to convince me that English writing was evolving into what we now have as textmessaging. I didn't buy it.


I think "shortcuts" is applicable in text messaging since there are limit on number of characters that you can type in a single message (200 characters here in Philippines). :sweat: But in chatrooms and forums like jdorama.com, sky is the limit when it comes to number of characters in a message/post, so I don't see any reason for kids to use those shortcuts, especially here.
26 Dec 2006, 23:13 #1087
bmwracer wrote:
Yeah, but people can't even type out "you" (u), "for" (4), and "don't" (dun), among others.... :shakehead:


My favorite is "prolly" for "probably". :hehe:

Thanx for the Chist info, Beem! :mrgreen:
27 Dec 2006, 01:37 #1088
Eve wrote:My favorite is "prolly" for "probably". :hehe:

Ah yeah, I forgot that one.

Thanx for the Chist info, Beem! :mrgreen:

Sure thing, Evie. :victory:
27 Dec 2006, 04:25 #1089
Saito_Hajime wrote:

I think "shortcuts" is applicable in text messaging since there are limit on number of characters that you can type in a single message (200 characters here in Philippines). :sweat: But in chatrooms and forums like jdorama.com, sky is the limit when it comes to number of characters in a message/post, so I don't see any reason for kids to use those shortcuts, especially here.


Exactly.

@Eve: I use prolly all the time... :ashamed:

On Topic: Christ was two years old already when the wise men went to visit him.
27 Dec 2006, 05:24 #1090
Wynter wrote:

On Topic: Christ was two years old already when the wise men went to visit him.


Really? I never knew that!

As for what you were saying about using contractions of words: There was a big writeup in the papers here about students being warned not to use texting contractions in their essays because they would be failed for doing so. Apparently it's reached epidemic proprtions here.
27 Dec 2006, 05:32 #1091
Anime Dad wrote:

Really? I never knew that!

As for what you were saying about using contractions of words: There was a big writeup in the papers here about students being warned not to use texting contractions in their essays because they would be failed for doing so. Apparently it's reached epidemic proprtions here.


Yesh, and the sad thing is that sometimes the kids don't realize. I get "u" instead of "you" all the time in papers, and when I show the kids, they're surprised.
27 Dec 2006, 05:35 #1092
That is sad. I try to discourage my girls from using it at all, but of course they still do. Not in schoolwork, fortunately :)

My son is another story altogether - his handwriting and spelling are atrocious anyway.
27 Dec 2006, 06:19 #1093
Saito_Hajime wrote:

I think "shortcuts" is applicable in text messaging since there are limit on number of characters that you can type in a single message (200 characters here in Philippines). :sweat: But in chatrooms and forums like jdorama.com, sky is the limit when it comes to number of characters in a message/post, so I don't see any reason for kids to use those shortcuts, especially here.


That's the sad part of it. With all these fast paced techno stuff, kids today get away easily from such "habits". :shakehead:
27 Dec 2006, 07:16 #1094
Anime Dad wrote:My son is another story altogether - his handwriting and spelling are atrocious anyway.

Future doctor. :beaten: :hehe:
27 Dec 2006, 07:29 #1095
bmwracer wrote:
Future doctor. :beaten: :hehe:


Prescription handwriting...and signature. :rofl:
29 Dec 2006, 06:35 #1096
After all the Addams family talk on the other thread, I looked up the bio on Carolyn Jones: she used to be married to Aaron Spelling and was the one who spurred him on to be a writer/producer. :shocked:

Fascinating.
29 Dec 2006, 06:37 #1097
bmwracer wrote:After all the Addams family talk on the other thread, I looked up the bio on Carolyn Jones: she used to be married to Aaron Spelling and was the one who spurred him on to be a writer/producer. :shocked:

Fascinating.


is she Tori Spelling's mom?
29 Dec 2006, 06:44 #1098
I don't think so. I think Tori's mum is a blonde bimbo like Tori.

Carolyn Jones is MUCH classier.

*edit*
Excerpt from Wikipedia:


Spelling divorced Jones in 1965 and in 1968 he married Carol Jean Marer, who took his name as Candy Spelling. He was father of Victoria Davey Spelling and Randall Gene Spelling, both of whom became actors as teenagers, as Tori Spelling and Randy Spelling.
29 Dec 2006, 06:49 #1099
Anime Dad wrote:I don't think so. I think Tori's mum is a blonde bimbo like Tori.

Carolyn Jones is MUCH classier.


Once a ho, always a ho....
29 Dec 2006, 08:59 #1100
Anime Dad wrote:I don't think so. I think Tori's mum is a blonde bimbo like Tori.

Carolyn Jones is MUCH classier.


No kidding. I worshipped Carolyn Jones as a kid when she was Morticia. :bow: Super classy.

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.