Home Theater/HDTV/et al...

[image]

bmwracer wrote:[image]

haha....you crazy. :hehe:

Tu_triky wrote:haha....you crazy. :hehe:

I Trekkie, er, Trekker.

But only TOS. :victory:

bmwracer wrote:
I Trekkie, er, Trekker.

But only TOS. :victory:

so you should get a 65" Sharp Aquos

Consumer Reports, December 2007:

46"-52"
1. Samsung (46", 1080p)
2. Sony Bravia (46", 1080p)
3. Sony Bravia (46", 720p)
4. LG (47", 1080p)
5. Sharp Aquos (52", 1080p)

40"-42"
1. Samsung (40", 720p)
2. Sony Bravia (40", 1080p)
3. Samsung (40", 1080p)
4. Sony Bravia (40", 720p)
5. LG (42", 1080p)

nothing in the 32-37 range?

krim wrote:nothing in the 32-37 range?

Gomen, I didn't type those in.

Here ya go:

37" LCD HDTV
1. LG (1080p)
2. Olevia (720p)
3. Magnavox (720p)
4. Sharp Aquos (720p)
5. Vizio (720p)

32" LCD HDTV
1. Sony Bravia (720p)
2. Sony Bravia (720p)
3. Panasonic (720p)
4. Samsung (720p)
5. Toshiba Regza (720p)

42" Plasma HDTV
1. Pioneer Elite Pro (720p)
2. Panasonic (720p)
3. Panasonic (1080p)
4. Samsung (720p)
5. LG (720p)

If you want complete model numbers on specific HDTVs, I can give 'em to you. :)

i think my sister has a subscription, i'll ask her for it on saturday... but wow, the 32 Aquos isn't on the list.. and it's 1080p. But if the Panas is the same as the one i posted on the first page... i might get that, since it'll be a touch over $500 w/ my friends discount.

krim wrote:i think my sister has a subscription, i'll ask her for it on saturday... but wow, the 32 Aquos isn't on the list.. and it's 1080p.

There's actually 14-32" models that they tested and all of them were 720p, which maybe why they left out the Aquos.... Or they couldn't get ahold of one at the time of testing.

But if the Panas is the same as the one i posted on the first page... i might get that, since it'll be a touch over $500 w/ my friends discount.

Yup, the Panny is the one you mentioned, the TC-32LX700.... And the price they paid was $950, so $500 or so is a great deal... :)

it helps that he works for a mouse controlled mega-corp w/ lots of buying power. ill have to see the Sharp and the Panasonic side by side to see if the extra $250 is worth it.

krim wrote:it helps that he works for a mouse controlled mega-corp w/ lots of buying power. ill have to see the Sharp and the Panasonic side by side to see if the extra $250 is worth it.

For 32," maybe the 1080p isn't as significant as it would be with the sizes 40" and above...

that's a possibility... maybe i should just up to the 37s. :hehe:

*looks at empty wallet*

Nope.. guess not.

krim wrote:that's a possibility... maybe i should just up to the 37s. :hehe:

*looks at empty wallet*

Nope.. guess not.

Take it to the limit. :victory:

bmwracer wrote:Yow, Triky beat your identical post by nanoseconds... :beaten:

I was going to say that great minds think alike....but that's clearly not the case here. :rofl:

I guess I should merge the DVD/HDDVD/Blu-Ray thread into this one since they fall under Home Theater....

krim wrote:that's a possibility... maybe i should just up to the 37s. :hehe:

*looks at empty wallet*

Nope.. guess not.

Go bigger. 7680 x 4320 ;)

http://www.nhk.or.jp/digital/en/super_hi/02_super.html

bmwracer wrote:I guess I should merge the DVD/HDDVD/Blu-Ray thread into this one since they fall under Home Theater....

Personally, I would keep them separated. They are distinct enough topics to have their own threads. My opinion, of course.

dochira wrote:Personally, I would keep them separated. They are distinct enough topics to have their own threads. My opinion, of course.

Okay, one vote for the opposition. :)

i agree w/ doch. it's not like they're both talking about those halloween bands.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: