Home Theater/HDTV/et al...

Started by arnel98 · 30 Dec 2006 · 1,679 replies

General Discussion Page 41 of 84

9 Jan 2008, 05:21 #801
Tu_triky wrote:discs, after a while when they start piling up, are a nuisance...with solid state memory getting cheaper and cheaper....i think that's the way to go....

From what I've read, solid state memory doesn't have the archival retention properties of discs... Or even tape media for that matter... Which is why there hasn't been a jump to solid state HDs over conventional electromechanical HDs...
9 Jan 2008, 05:24 #802
bmwracer wrote:
From what I've read, solid state memory doesn't have the archival retention properties of discs... Or even tape media for that matter... Which is why there hasn't been a jump to solid state HDs over conventional electromechanical HDs...


I see. I see. An obvious concern.
9 Jan 2008, 05:32 #803
I just want them to make up their minds.

I just bought a big plasma. I have to go buy a new DVD player soon. Very soon.

Man, I'm just trying to avoid the next generation version of beta max.
9 Jan 2008, 05:36 #804
Geezer wrote:I just want them to make up their minds.

I just bought a big plasma. I have to go buy a new DVD player soon. Very soon.

Man, I'm just trying to avoid the next generation version of beta max.


My friend just bought a 52 inch Sharp Aquos LCD for Christmas...I need to check that sucker out.
9 Jan 2008, 05:39 #805
Geezer wrote:I just want them to make up their minds.

I just bought a big plasma. I have to go buy a new DVD player soon. Very soon.

Man, I'm just trying to avoid the next generation version of beta max.

Geez:

To tide you over, just get the Philips DVP-5982 like the ones I bought my brothers for Xmas: $60 at Amazon or Costco, 1080p upscaling/upconverting HDMI output, DivX/xVid compatible, USB port, and Region hackable...

A steal.
9 Jan 2008, 05:41 #806
My bro's new comp has a TV tuner card in it. We were messing around with it last night, it records at 1MB per second at the best quality ... that's 3.6G per hour :shocked: but even on the lowest quality, it still looks good. I recorded a few minutes of NCIS (127MB file) and used ConvertXtoDVD to burn it to DVD, just to show them how it works. It looked great on their TV :victory:
9 Jan 2008, 05:44 #807
Anime Dad wrote:My bro's new comp has a TV tuner card in it. We were messing around with it last night, it records at 1MB per second at the best quality ... that's 3.6G per hour :shocked: but even on the lowest quality, it still looks good. I recorded a few minutes of NCIS (127MB file) and used ConvertXtoDVD to burn it to DVD, just to show them how it works. It looked great on their TV :victory:


nice!
9 Jan 2008, 05:45 #808
Tu_triky wrote:My friend just bought a 52 inch Sharp Aquos LCD for Christmas...I need to check that sucker out.

My ex-officemate bought one a couple of months ago... It's awesome. :victory:

And he bought it online of all places... And saved nearly $1K. :victory: :victory:
9 Jan 2008, 05:48 #809
bmwracer wrote:
My ex-officemate bought one a couple of months ago... It's awesome. :victory:

And he bought it online of all places... And saved nearly $1K. :victory: :victory:


Shiet looks bombay = awesome...I've only seen it on ads and the like...my boy bought it for 2000....and he loves to play videogames so he's been putting his Xbox on heavy rotation.

Long before he got the TV a bought him a oppo digital upscaling dvd player so it must be great now that it's hooked up to that nice screen.
9 Jan 2008, 05:52 #810
Tu_triky wrote:my boy bought it for 2000....

That's a GREAT price for a 52" LCD... And an Aquos, to boot. :thumbsup:
9 Jan 2008, 05:54 #811
BMW

Thanks. I'll hit Amazon.
9 Jan 2008, 05:58 #812
bmwracer wrote:
That's a GREAT price for a 52" LCD... And an Aquos, to boot. :thumbsup:



yup I sent him the link for that price from tigerdirect.com and when he wrote back he told me he'd already seen it and bought the sucker...
9 Jan 2008, 06:06 #813
Geezer wrote:BMW

Thanks. I'll hit Amazon.

While you're there, you might wanna buy and HDMI cable or two... They're A LOT cheaper than the $30+ ones Best Buy and other walk-in stores are charging... :shakehead:
9 Jan 2008, 07:52 #814
To paraphrase Popular Mechanics on HDMI cables: "Get the cheapest no name one, it's all digital, either it works or it doesn't."
9 Jan 2008, 07:56 #815
krim wrote:To paraphrase Popular Mechanics on HDMI cables: "Get the cheapest no name one, it's all digital, either it works or it doesn't."


To paraphrase me....If you ain't got trees, don't bother me.
9 Jan 2008, 08:30 #816
krim wrote:To paraphrase Popular Mechanics on HDMI cables: "Get the cheapest no name one, it's all digital, either it works or it doesn't."

The ones I bought from Amazon were 64 cents each... :beaten:

Though shipping was $4.98.


I think they cut the price to 32 cents last week. :hehe:
10 Jan 2008, 08:44 #817

TVs race to be thin; one is 1/8" thick

LAS VEGAS, Nevada (AP) -- -- HDTV manufacturers are trying to make the task of buying an HDTV set much more difficult than just choosing between LCD and plasma, 42 inches or 46 inches.
art.ces.ap.jpg

A wall at the Consumer Electronics Show holds Toshiba's Regza LCD television display.

To stand out amid fierce competition, they're adding exotic features, and even a little bit of color to the plain black bezels that have been de rigueur. They're also chasing each other to zero -- zero thickness, that is. Apparently, you can't be too thin if you're a TV.

All the major Asian brands revealed new sets at the International Consumer Electronics Show, which started Monday. Most of the innovation comes from the prestigious names, like Sony, Pioneer, Panasonic and Toshiba, which are trying to keep HDTVs from becoming a commodity product. If one 42-inch LCD is the same as another, the buyer is going to be looking mostly at price, and that kills the manufacturer's margins.

This happened to DVD players years ago: when unknown Asian manufacturers were able to slap together players and sell them for $50, Sony couldn't make money in the category.

"The goal is to break away from the commoditized market," said Ken Shioda, general manager of display products for Pioneer.

Pioneer Corp. is one of the companies working to put its sets on a diet: it demonstrated a plasma TV with a thickness of just 9 millimeters, or three-eighths of an inch, claiming it is the thinnest 50-inch set ever. It's just a prototype, however. Pioneer said sets that thin would not be on the market this year, but possibly next.Video Watch what other thin, hot gadgets are at the show »

Hitachi Ltd. is showing off an LCD display that is twice as thick: three-fourths of an inch. That's also a prototype, but the company is bringing LCDs that are 1.5 inches thick to the U.S. market in the second quarter after launching them in Japan in December. U.S. prices were not announced.

The ultimate in thinness is achievable with a completely different screen technology: organic light-emitting diodes, or OLEDs. Sony Corp. announced it will soon start selling the first OLED screen in the U.S. It's just 3 millimeters, or one-eighth of an inch thick. The catch -- actually, the first of two catches -- is that the screen area is also minimal, at 11 inches diagonally. The second catch is the price tag: about $2,500.

A set's thinness may not be readily apparent in an electronics store, so some manufacturers are adding color to the bezels of the TVs. But their move away from the all-black scheme is timid. You won't find a leaf green or sky blue HDTV set to match your wallpaper anytime soon. A slight touch of red is as far as they'll go: both Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. are adding accents of that color to their otherwise black LCD bezels.

The purchase process for flat-panel TVs is no longer dominated by men saying "give me the biggest TV I can get," said Tim Baxter, executive vice president of sales and marketing for the consumer electronics division of Samsung Electronics America. TVs now need to pass muster with women, who look at whether the design fits in a room, he added.

On the technical side, sets with the so-called "Full HD" or "1080p" resolution became the standard for middle- to high-end LCD and rear-projection sets last year, and plasma sets with that resolution have also appeared. There is no real space for improvement in that direction: 1080p, or 1,920 by 1,080 pixels, is the maximum resolution of today's high-definition discs, and higher than broadcast HD signals.

Instead, another feature looks set to become a standard in 2008: sets that show 120 frames per second. HDTV signals are usually broadcast in 30 frames per second, and movies are shot at 24 frames per second, so the usefulness of a set showing more frames isn't immediately obvious. But 120 hertz sets compute frames to insert between the signal's frames, yielding visibly smoother motion and sharper pictures in action scenes.

"120 hertz is the new 1080p," said Scott Ramirez, vice president of TV marketing at Toshiba.

High image refresh rates are also useful for three-dimensional imaging. Viewers wearing glasses with liquid-crystal shutters that alternately black out and reveal the TV set, in sync with the image refresh rate, can be shown different images for the right and left eyes if the refresh rate is high enough. That produces a stereoscopic, or 3-D effect.

Samsung brought out 3-D-capable rear-projection sets last year. At CES, it announced plasma sets with the same capability.
advertisement

There aren't many movies available in 3-D, but many video games can be played in 3-D. Texas Instruments Inc., which makes the core components of many rear-projection sets, introduced another technology at the show that uses the same elements to help gamers out: DualView.

In essence, two gamers wearing shutter-equipped glasses will be able look at the same screen but see different images. That means the screen doesn't have to be divided down the middle for two-player gaming. That should prevent the cheating that occurs when one player peeks at the other's half of the screen, TI said
10 Jan 2008, 08:51 #818
Tu_triky wrote:
TVs race to be thin; one is 1/8" thick

Man, that's ridiculous... Once you get below a several of inches in thickness, does it really matter?

It's all one-upsmanship from that point on, IMO.
10 Jan 2008, 08:54 #819
bmwracer wrote:
Man, that's ridiculous... Once you get below a several of inches in thickness, does it really matter?

It's all one-upsmanship from that point on, IMO.


pretty soon they'll have screens you can paste on your ass....
10 Jan 2008, 08:54 #820
I've heard that they are also trying to use OLED's to create flexible screens: Screens that will wrap around curved surfaces etc :bonk:

*edit* Such as Tu's ass....

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.