Kijinnmaru wrote:Revenge and duty. Their duty was to avenge their lord and they succeeded. That's why I side with the Ako ronin. They had a mission to see through and did it. Their seppuku was less for their lord and more that they were owning up to their responsibility. They knew what they did was illegal and knew they had to pay for it.
I'm not a fan of Yamamoto Tsunetomo, or "classic" bushido for that matter. I think what most Japanese and the rest of the world sees as the "way of the warrior" is Yamamoto's BS. Yamamoto lived and wrote about "bushido" several generations after Japan had finally entered a period of peace. Bushido to him was more about legitimizing a warrior class during extended peace. It's easy to spout about the warrior code when there was no war to fight.
Bringing things back to Fuurin Kazan, you'll like the end of Yamamoto Kansuke.
Hey now, I usually don't like Yamamoto Tsunetomo either. His ramblings about women, for example, yikes... I'd thwack him would he still be alive. Taira Shigesuke (Daidoji Yuzan) was closer to the era of war than Yamamoto, so I prefer his writings. Yagyu Munenori also wrote a few interesting things, same with Musashi, but they focused a bit too much on fencing. Nevertheless, their works are quite an interesting read.
The thing with "duty" in the case of the 47 is a problem, though. I mean, yes, they had their duty towards their liege lord. Correct. But, their liege lord was a retainer of the shogun, thus they also had a duty towards the shogun. Which leaves them in quite a dilemma. Should they follow their duty to their master? Or should they follow their duty to the shogun who is the master of their master? I don't think it was an easy decision, and we see this motive appear again later, with the Shinsengumi and the imperial restoration. Yes, they were on the side of the shogun, as it was their duty as retainers of the shogun and every samurai was a retainer of the Tokugawa. However, the "rightful" ruler was the emperor and the shogun was nothing more but a "steward" for the emperor. Who do you follow in such a situation? If I may say so, that really sucked.
And the biggest problem I have with the 47 is: they kill Kira, so far so good. They bring his head to the grave of their master, fine. And then... they hand themselves in to the shogun. I still think that was a bad decision. It makes the whole thing look as if they were hoping to get away with it. They knew it was illegal, they should have comitted seppuku right away. Instead they wait for the shogun to sentence them to any punishment. Oh well, nothing is perfect.
But I think we agree on one thing: Kira had it coming.
I'm looking forward to the end of Fuurinkazan. Curious who else bites the dust. And, I've already preordered the DVD sets.