Video Games/Gaming/etc.

Started by DarKchylD · 24 Jul 2003 · 3,991 replies

General Discussion Page 98 of 200

18 Jun 2006, 13:25 #1941
w3bhead wrote:

Release date(s)
August 13, 1985 (Japan)
October 18, 1985 (North America)

:shocked:


that came with my nes when i received it as wee lil' natto bean that hadn't sprouted or become stinky yet.
18 Jun 2006, 13:28 #1942
w3bhead wrote:

Release date(s)
August 13, 1985 (Japan)
October 18, 1985 (North America)

:shocked:


:wow: That's really old school. Where did you get that info?
18 Jun 2006, 13:39 #1943
wikipedia????
18 Jun 2006, 13:44 #1944
K.T.Tran wrote:wikipedia????


I should have known :banghead:
18 Jun 2006, 16:17 #1945
Wikipedia RULES. I spend a ridiculous amount of time reading about the most random shit on there.
18 Jun 2006, 19:34 #1946
blender1184 wrote:Wikipedia RULES. I spend a ridiculous amount of time reading about the most random shit on there.


Yeah, it's the best source of random infos in the net :say_yes: :thumbsup:
19 Jun 2006, 12:53 #1947
Tu_triky wrote:

that came with my nes when i received it as wee lil' natto bean that hadn't sprouted or become stinky yet.


:hehe: You were still a pure and untainted soul back then, like a newly created ningyo, freshly carved from wood.


Saito_Hajime wrote:
:wow: That's really old school. Where did you get that info?


I got it form wikipedia bud. :victory: I agree, Wikipedia rules. I can find almost any article I want to look for in there, from artists, to current events, game, to even totally random stuff. I even recently found out that there's an article there on WARDORBE MALFUNCTION. :beaten:
19 Jun 2006, 12:56 #1948
w3bhead wrote:I even recently found out that there's an article there on WARDORBE MALFUNCTION. :beaten:


Janet Jackson during the Super Bowl Half Time performance last year was it??? :sweat:
19 Jun 2006, 13:01 #1949
K.T.Tran wrote:

Janet Jackson during the Super Bowl Half Time performance last year was it??? :sweat:


Yup. That was the main feature of the article, but apparently Janet wasn't the only celebrity who had that wardrobe malfunction. There were other celebrities who had wardrobe malfunctions even before she did, so I guess she wasn't the original. :beaten:
19 Jun 2006, 13:39 #1950
w3bhead wrote:

Yup. That was the main feature of the article, but apparently Janet wasn't the only celebrity who had that wardrobe malfunction. There were other celebrities who had wardrobe malfunctions even before she did, so I guess she wasn't the original. :beaten:


My most favorite is the Tara Reid wardrobe malfunction incident :naughty: :mrgreen: :beaten:
19 Jun 2006, 13:45 #1951
Saito_Hajime wrote:

My most favorite is the Tara Reid wardrobe malfunction incident :naughty: :mrgreen: :beaten:


:lol: Tara Reid's case was more like an all-out wardrobe breakdown, not just a malfunction. :beaten:
19 Jun 2006, 13:49 #1952
w3bhead wrote:

:lol: Tara Reid's case was more like an all-out wardrobe breakdown, not just a malfunction. :beaten:


Yeah, it does look like it was done on purpose. :sweat: But at least we benefit from it and got to see better view of her, well, you know :mrgreen:
19 Jun 2006, 13:50 · edited #1953
w3bhead wrote:

:lol: Tara Reid's case was more like an all-out wardrobe breakdown, not just a malfunction. :beaten:


:rofl: :rofl: It sure was.

Jessica Alba's incident can't be wardrobe malfunction....nor Linsey Lohan *pardon my bad spelling if its wrong* She just decided not to wear underwear :sweat: Poor kids.... :beaten:
19 Jun 2006, 13:58 #1954
K.T.Tran wrote:

:rofl: :rofl: It sure was.

Jessica Alba's incident can be wardrobe malfunction....nor Linsey Lohan *pardon my bad spelling if its wrong* She just decided not to wear underwear :sweat: Poor kids.... :beaten:


Can't blame them if they don't feel comfortable on wearing underwears :beaten: :hehe:
19 Jun 2006, 14:02 #1955
K.T.Tran wrote:

:rofl: :rofl: It sure was.

Jessica Alba's incident can be wardrobe malfunction....nor Linsey Lohan *pardon my bad spelling if its wrong* She just decided not to wear underwear :sweat: Poor kids.... :beaten:


Such a pity, all that money and she can't even buy a single underwear. she probably thought it wasn't as important as, let's say... $3000 shoes.
19 Jun 2006, 14:04 #1956
w3bhead wrote:

Such a pity, all that money and she can't even buy a single underwear. she probably thought it wasn't as important as, let's say... $3000 shoes.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
She doesn't know whats important :shakehead:
If girls starts running around in dresses w/o underwear on, the parents know who to blame :victory:
19 Jun 2006, 14:08 #1957
Damn, these kids are not properly bred, and to think that they are considered role models for the youth :shakehead:
19 Jun 2006, 14:58 #1958
K.T.Tran wrote:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
She doesn't know whats important :shakehead:
If girls starts running around in dresses w/o underwear on, the parents know who to blame :victory:


Ultimately though, the ones to be blamed are the fashion designers themselves for creating such defective wardrobes. They should include a money-back guarantee clause for the clothes they design and create for hollywood celebrities.

===========================================================================================================
THE CALVIN KLEIN QUALITY ASSURANCE

Each Calvin Klein wardrobe has been created with the highest and most expensive material, and has been fabricated carefully to ensure that it meets the very demanding technical specifications of your body. Each seam and stitch has been subjected to various durability tests and strict quality control to make sure that each Calvin Klein original can withstand exteme wearing conditions and would last for a lifetime or as long as you, the hollywood celebrity, are still popular, whichever comes first. However, should a wardrobe malfunction occur at any point during use, you may proceed to the nearest CK botique to return the defective article clothing, for a full refund of your purchase.

This guarantee does not include wardrobe malfunctions that occur outside the United States of America.

===========================================================================================================
20 Jun 2006, 04:22 #1959
Tu_triky wrote:
that came with my nes when i received it as wee lil' natto bean that hadn't sprouted or become stinky yet.

Wow, I don't think that came with mine. I only got SMB.

Incidentally, was I the only one blowing into the NES cartidges to get them to work?
20 Jun 2006, 04:33 #1960
dochira wrote:
Wow, I don't think that came with mine. I only got SMB.

Incidentally, was I the only one blowing into the NES cartidges to get them to work?


i used to have to do that often....after the machine got older and begain to collect dust...like my brain.

Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.