shari wrote:I'd say, more like "nihongo no jugyou dai san ka" or “ú–{Œê‚ÌŽö‹Æ‘æŽO‰Û.
Only my two cents. Or my first two-cent Japanese lesson in three words.
IZUMIgrad wrote:‘æŽl‰ñ means "the fourth (of something)". What Shari-san wrote is more correct. Žö‹Æ‘æŽO‰Û means "lesson 3", so "lesson 4" is Žö‹Æ‘æŽl‰Û.
Oh! I may be over-asking this, but, can't you say the fourth japanese lesson? Using ‘æŽl‰ñ ? Or is ‘æX‰ñ meant more for f.ex the fourth meeting? the fourth date... etc.
I saw that the Genki 1 book uses ‘æX‰Û on their chapters, so is the use of ‘æX‰Û not just limited to chapters in a book?
Sorry for the questions, but I want to make sure I completely understand it :P
Julieh wrote:Or is ‘æX‰ñ meant more for f.ex the fourth meeting? the fourth date... etc.
Yes. ‘æŽl means fourth (dai yon). So if you add ‰ñ (kai), it means the fourth of something or the fourth time. ‰Û (ka) is the counter for lessons and chapters in a book.
IZUMIgrad wrote:
Yes. ‘æŽl means fourth (dai yon). So if you add ‰ñ (kai), it means the fourth of something or the fourth time. ‰Û (ka) is the counter for lessons and chapters in a book.
gaijinmark wrote:Your own Mom okasan, don't EVER refer to somebody else's Mom as okasan. Same goes for Dad, you dad is otosan, for someone else's use chichi.
What Uruchan wrote is correct. When you talk about your own family you use the humble form (haha/chichi) and when you talk about another person's family or talk directly to your own relatives you use the honorific form (san/sama).
IZUMIgrad wrote:
What Uruchan wrote is correct. When you talk about your own family you use the humble form (haha/chichi) and when you talk about another person's family or talk directly to your own relatives you use the honorific form (san/sama).
Like when you are saying something about your father or mother to someone else: watashi no haha/chichi wa ... . If you call your own father or mother you still call them by saying 'otoosan'/'okaasan'
i'm trying to write an email to a new Japanese penpal, and i'm not sure if this is right:
‚ ‚È‚½‚Ì‚¦‚¢‚²‚͂킽‚µ‚̂ɂقñ‚²‚æ‚è‚¶‚傤‚¸‚Å‚·B@| Your english is more skilled than my Japanese....
Although I don't have anything to back me up, and I may be completely wrong, I would phrase it: @‚ ‚È‚½‚Ì@‰pŒê@‚Í@ãŽè@‚Å‚·A‚¯‚ê‚Ç@Ž„@‚Ì@“ú–{Œê@‚¨@‰ºŽè@‚Å‚·@(Anata no eigo wa jozu desu, keredo watashi no nihongo o heta desu) Your english is good, however, my japanese is bad.
gaijinmark wrote:Although I don't have anything to back me up, and I may be completely wrong, I would phrase it: @‚ ‚È‚½‚Ì@‰pŒê@‚Í@ãŽè@‚Å‚·A‚¯‚ê‚Ç@Ž„@‚Ì@“ú–{Œê@‚¨@‰ºŽè@‚Å‚·@(Anata no eigo wa jozu desu, keredo watashi no nihongo o heta desu) Your english is good, however, my japanese is bad.
Thanks g-mark, i'll try that. I'm sure she will correct me if it's wrong ;)
gaijinmark wrote:Although I don't have anything to back me up, and I may be completely wrong, I would phrase it: @‚ ‚È‚½‚Ì@‰pŒê@‚Í@ãŽè@‚Å‚·A‚¯‚ê‚Ç@Ž„@‚Ì@“ú–{Œê@‚¨@‰ºŽè@‚Å‚·@(Anata no eigo wa jozu desu, keredo watashi no nihongo o heta desu) Your english is good, however, my japanese is bad.
That was fine, except for the "o" part. In this case, you should use the (contrasting) "wa" (‚Í) instead.
So it should be:
‚ ‚È‚½‚̉pŒê‚ÍãŽè‚Å‚·A‚¯‚ê‚ÇŽ„‚Ì“ú–{Œê‚͉ºŽè‚Å‚·@(Anata no eigo wa jouzu desu, keredo watashi no nihongo wa heta desu)
Oh, I thought I commented about it. Or maybe I did in my mind and forgot to actually type it out. :sweat: Anyway, I thought that was fine and I probably would've used either yours or gaijinmark's suggestion. :)
Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.