supermidget wrote:I was just wondering... when exactly are the negatives ‚¸ and ‚È‚¢‚Å used? All I know is EEE‚È‚¢‚ʼnº‚³‚¢ :sweat: Could you use either of these negatives in a sentences like:
ƒKƒX‚ðÁ‚³‚È‚¢‚Åo‚Ä‚µ‚Ü‚¤
supposedly meaning "leaving without turning off the gas".
And what is the difference (in nuance) with constructions like ‚È‚‚Ä and ‚È‚‚Ä‚à?
Thanks alot! :bow:
Yeah, it's usually translated as "without."
Literally, it means "(I) didn't turn of the gas
and left (the house)."
You could also say:
ƒKƒX‚ðÁ‚³‚¸‚ɉƂðo‚Ä‚µ‚Ü‚¤B
which means the exact same thing (the nuance is a tiny bit different, but for all practical purposes, you can assume them the same).
Just for your reference, VERB+‚¸‚É is a construction that comes from classical Japanese.
‚È‚‚Ä can be used for the same type of sentence, but the implied meaning is different. In the above ‚È‚¢‚Å example, the subject is the same person, but there are two separate actions: [(I) didn't turn the light off] and [(I) left].
However, with ‚È‚‚Ä, the first verb is a cause of the second action or response as seen in the below example.
‚¤‚¿‚ÌŽq‹Ÿ‚ÍÅ‹ßA‘S‘R•׋‚µ‚Ä‚‚ê‚È‚‚Ä¢‚Á‚Ä‚¢‚Ü‚·B (Uchi no kodomo ha saikin zenzen benkyou shite kurenakute komatteimasu.)
"I'm troubled because lately my child will not study."
The subject of •׋‚µ‚È‚¢ is the Žq‹Ÿ and the subject of ¢‚é is Ž„.
That's only one way of using ‚È‚‚Ä, but I hope it helps a little.
HTH,
‘‰¤š