a-nesuto wrote:
a few hours, lucky
i'll have a 12 hour shift. 12 to 12 :nut:
then on sunday a 12 to 10. maybe 11...
sounds brutal, ....the 12 hour shift... :beaten: :bleh:
Started by kndy-nt2099 · 18 Feb 2004 · 6,255 replies
a-nesuto wrote:
a few hours, lucky
i'll have a 12 hour shift. 12 to 12 :nut:
then on sunday a 12 to 10. maybe 11...
My supervisor himself is new and incompetent in his position.I feel your pain Kou, I got a review once and he wrote that I have a "facetios" attitude(He was trying to say "facetious") I got done reading the review and said, "You know, you mispelled facetious", :rofl: About 6 months later they fired his dumbass :applaud: [/list:u]
gaijin mark wrote:KouSeiya315 wrote:My supervisor himself is new and incompetent in his position.I feel your pain Kou, I got a review once and he wrote that I have a "facetios" attitude(He was trying to say "facetious") I got done reading the review and said, "You know, you mispelled facetious", :rofl: About 6 months later they fired his dumbass :applaud: [/list:u]
KouSeiya315 wrote:
Yeah, mine misspelled "professional" as "professial" on my review. During the review interview thingie, I was just like "Ok, I understand", when he skimmed through and didn't make it sound like he tore me a new asshole. It's when I read it myself that I realized what he wrote. After I signed it. However, I was told signing doesn't necessarily mean I agree, but that we interviewed.
He kept checking off "Needs Improvement" a few times without clearly explaining in the comments section. One comment section would contradict another. For example, he wrote:
section 1: Does only what's minimally required of the position. Has difficulty looking beyond the scope of the job description and requires occasional prompting to do so. <~Since when is doing what's required of my job a negative thing? I get rated poorly b/c I won't go above and beyond to do extra $h!t I'm not required to do and don't NEED to do?
section 2: Does over average amount of work. Work can be depended on and rarely needs correction. Rarely needs prompting for meeting deadlines. <~Wait a minute, I thought I only did the bare minimum....
section 3: Handles all but the most difficult clients/situations. <~ What? You tell me to ask for help/advice, you give me useless advice, and now I'm rated poorly for ASKING for assistance w/ difficult situations????
As for other things that I admit I DID wrongly, I feel I should have been corrected on it WAY before my annual performance review. I could have had a chance to correct them months ago.
One part, I totally admit I suck at (chartwork). A specific part of chart paperwork I was NOT informed of, so I received no credit for work I did and got an "unacceptable" rating because I didn't know I could check off "yes" instead of "no", but it is still what it is (a "yes", but he didn't tell me it would have been). Also, much of my work that was done was not yet filed, so I didn't receive credit for that work either b/c it wasn't in the charts when he checked. Plus, I closed 10-11 cases this year, all of which I spent time working on and didn't get credit for towards this review.
Everyone else got their reviews today and all did well......MUCH better than me :puppydog: Even the laziest terds got better reviews and bigger raises than me. I talked to co-workers who know me and my work ethic, and all were shocked that I got such a poor review. People are telling me to fight it. I think it's too late, and who would I talk to about it????? I'm afraid of going back to the supervisor and fighting this. I'm also afraid of going above him b/c 1) I already had the in-person review, 2) I don't want it to seem like I'm bitter and just retaliating, and 3) I don't want to have to deal with tension @ work by stirring up a mess. I don't feel I was specifically targetted or anything like that. But I do feel like I wasn't quite accurately rated.
I don't know what to do. :shamefulcry:
gaijin mark wrote:The new gung-ho manager is now referred to as "BroomHilda" by her people :hehe: Took her less than a week to piss everybody off, that's a new record :bonk:
ahochaude wrote:
Hi hun!
Miss you! Do you want me to tear your boss a new asshole and then shoot him for you?! Lemme know.
823 <--- (remember that code from 'pager' days? haha)
your boy,
aho
KouSeiya315 wrote:I found out it is not too late to add comments to my review so I decided to do that. I don't know how it would pan out but ehhh. I'm sure it won't change anything but at least I will have responded.good for you! :thumbsup:
littlemissfab wrote:Noooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
But didn't they just move there recently? That's odd..
kenjilina wrote:the sales team had a girl from an agency in today. she was hot!!! :naughty: :nut: :naughty:
sadly only here for a day. :grumble:
niko2x wrote:good for you! :thumbsup:
would it be too late to talk to another supervisor about your review? even if the "higher-boss" cannot do anything, at the very least will know that something with the review is not kosher and will/should act accordingly. (I hate review time as well. we have it every quarter)
Replying needs an account. Registration opens soon.